The Guru
Fred Wood (13)
Arnt NSW now a year older with the new system in Qld for next year already started in NSW?Is it possible that NSW are just better than QLD?
Arnt NSW now a year older with the new system in Qld for next year already started in NSW?Is it possible that NSW are just better than QLD?
Actually there is 4 Aic and 2 GPSInteresting to see 3 AIC boys in the Australian Schools XV and only 1 QLD GPS! Could be a selection scheme matter.. Wonder if that has ever happened before?
Also the starting 15 won't be announced until a few days before each test match.Interesting to see 3 AIC boys in the Australian Schools XV and only 1 QLD GPS! Could be a selection scheme matter.. Wonder if that has ever happened before?
I don't think so..given that selectors in both States have a very similar player base to draw from. Perhaps QLD can review their selection practices against those of NSW and see if changes need to be made there. Maybe it is time to review the coaching. Looking for excuses is not going to win games.
I don't think it is any coincidence that Queensland Schoolboys run of six national titles have been followed by two poor performances has come at the same time that Qld's GPS season has been moved to Term 3.
Expecting QLD players to perform at the level required that a National Championships having not played a genuine competition fixture is unrealistic. Trial matches just don't have the same intensity.
This of course also gives the AIC boys a distinct advantage and I am not surprised to see more AIC players were selected as a result.
Only the GPS Headmasters can change this. There attempt to contain the season to one term has clearly failed, with most GPS teams now training and playing over 3 terms.
BBC played Harrow school of UK today at Toowong.
Match report as follows:
1) Harrow is over 400 years old and has a strong rugby pedigree with several of its past students playing in the World Cup winning England under 20 team this year(also 6 nations under 20 champs).Of course they are also a year older with most of the boys 18 this year.
2) BBC fielded it's number 1 team except Conrad Quick(Qld 2-injured again!!!),Gunter (number 6- NSW country league -injured)and GPS 100 champ Noel Mclean (dropped to 2nds -disciplinary?).Mclean ran riot in 2nds and scored 4 tries.
3) new recruit from NZ- Wilkins played at outside centre to replace Quick and not at fullback. He did not really get in the match and if Quick remains injured(like last year)they have a problem at 13. ;
4) when I left 10 mins in 2nd half BBC lead 29-12(22-5 at halftime);
5)surprisingly, it was the BBC forwards that dominated with Ben- Roy S and especially Bronson T unstoppable and the BBC scrum a dominant force;
6) The star BBC backline trio of Bowen/Russell/Wilkins tried to be to fancy and dropped a lot of ball.Bowen did not do much either.
Player of the match BBC captain & 2013 combined states player -Bronson Takipolou.
NC to be without boarders most likely wont stop the boys in blue and white. NC by 15+Trial games this Saturday July 13
GT v NC (Tennyson)
BBC v BGS
Trial games this Saturday July 13
GT v NC (Tennyson)
BBC v BGS
Competition finishes Friday I believeMany of the GPS A/B teams from ACGS, TGS, GT and TSS playing in a rugby tournament from 13's up to Opens on the Gold Coast this week at the TSS grounds.
Expecting QLD players to perform at the level required that a National Championships having not played a genuine competition fixture is unrealistic. Trial matches just don't have the same intensity.
I think this is part of the picture.......
This year they also had only two competition games (GPS again) but from reading the quote above that is two more than the Qld lads got (is that also only GPS or did all school comps start late?).
I think it does make a difference and more so for Qld Schools whose boys are younger on the average.
.
Trial games this Saturday July 13
GT v NC (Tennyson)
BBC v BGS
GT 10. Terrible game. GT missing Leofa, Grace, Larosa, Laxon. I'd imagine NC were missing some too.NC36 def.GT5
I don't think it is any coincidence that Queensland Schoolboys run of six national titles have been followed by two poor performances has come at the same time that Qld's GPS season has been moved to Term 3.
Expecting QLD players to perform at the level required that a National Championships having not played a genuine competition fixture is unrealistic. Trial matches just don't have the same intensity.
This of course also gives the AIC boys a distinct advantage and I am not surprised to see more AIC players were selected as a result.
Only the GPS Headmasters can change this. There attempt to contain the season to one term has clearly failed, with most GPS teams now training and playing over 3 terms.
Vegas - spot on here. I have to say how the QRFSU teams go at the Nationals is probably not something the GPS Heads worry too much about. An irrefutable fact is that in the GPS schools, rugby is the biggest participation sport. With Term 3 rugby, the most important exams for senior boys plus the QCS test falls in the last third of the season, making things quite difficult for boys focused on their studies. Meanwhile soccer gets term 2 billing which is a farce because the A level soccer teams owe allegiance to their clubs before their schools as their rep pathway is club based. There may be a smattering of teams out on ovals but nothing like rugby season. I know because I have picked up sons and nephews after trainings for other sports and seen it for myself. Any boy thinking he can successfully play A level soccer and then rugby simply can't do both because the rugby season effectively begins by halfway through Term 2. By the way, I heard today that IGS is flat out forming a 16A rugby side this year. With virtually only a firsts and seconds in Open and the 16's the only other area the school can draw on, depth may be a significant issue by the second half of the season. A sorry scene at a former rugby powerhouse.Completely agree James - the pre-season injury risk to the GPS boys is unacceptable. Similarly, now with the GPS junior schools joining the GPS comp from CIC, it makes it all the stronger argument to consolidate rugby as a term 2 sport. And while the headmasters are at it, a bit more navel gazing would see a good decision being changing the playing groups back to year levels rather than age levels, so that boys can play with their mates. With the new cohort of kids coming through with a June 30 year entry cut-off, they may as well make the change now before the playing groups are all over the place like a mad woman's breakfast !!