QF 4 Brumbies vs Hurricanes 4-07 7.35pm AEST, 9.35pm NZT

[KOB1987]

Yeah that was dangerous, cant charge into rucks like that surely

Dane coles can apparently. What was the time stamp, I missed it, I’ll go back and look at it during the half time soccer highlights.

 

[Pokinacha]

Surely white walking in front of the ball carrier at the back of the maul, not bound, is offside

 

[SteveWA]

Only a yellow for kiwis

No consistency whatsoever. Foul play is foul play.

 

[whitefalcon]

So, in a one eyed view, does shoulder to shoulder then a head clash actually matter in that circumstance? I can understand when its shoulder to shoulder then shoulder to head, that's a mitigation, but when you come in like that causing a head clash it makes me wonder... (and reminds me of Bank's red card earlier in the year)

 

[whitefalcon]

Dane coles can apparently. What was the time stamp, I missed it, I’ll go back and look at it during the half time soccer highlights.

its like 2 seconds after Ikitau's red card tackle

 

[whitefalcon]

White is 100% off side in that ruck.

 

[Dan54]

So, in a one eyed view, does shoulder to shoulder then a head clash actually matter in that circumstance? I can understand when its shoulder to shoulder then shoulder to head, that's a mitigation, but when you come in like that causing a head clash it makes me wonder... (and reminds me of Bank's red card earlier in the year)

Wasn't that ruled as not red because shoulder to shoulder first.
I actually thought I would be happy with yellow for both in this game

 

[dru]

White is 100% off side in that ruck.

No. He's gone in to point out the the bloke who was called out by the ref for being illegal did not retire. He was trying to remove a player the ref already called illegal.

 

[kiap]

Nai-ice!

 

[Pokinacha]

No. He's gone in to point out the the bloke who was called out by the ref for being illegal did not retire. He was trying to remove a player the ref already called illegal.

But in doing so, is in front of the ball carrier and is offside.

 

[dru]

Who's at 10?

 

[dru]

But in doing so, is in front of the ball carrier and is offside.

Matching continued illegal play by the other player. Ref decided to ignore both.

 

[whitefalcon]

Who's at 10?

looks like Simone at 10 and Sapsford at 12.5

 

[SteveWA]

Wasn't that ruled as not red because shoulder to shoulder first.
I actually thought I would be happy with yellow for both in this game

where in the protocol does it talk about first contact versus outcome?

 

[kiap]

Too easy there

 

[Dismal Pillock]

Ala'alatoa should demand an apology from the ref for his team having less points on the scoreboard at halftime than the other team.

Amazing handling from the Canes given the conditions.

Mental clash of styles on show. Proactive ball-in-hand running rugby from the Canes vs kick and hope and pray you fuck up + pray for next maul anti-rugby from the Bumbreeze.

Nic White querying every single call - even his own teams knock-ons ffs - must get reeeeeeaaallly fahhhhhhking oooolllllld for the refs.

 

[KOB1987]

its like 2 seconds after Ikitau's red card tackle

Yeah right, seen it now. IMO that’s deliberate and worse foul play than the incident that was given red. Coles is an out and out filthy cnut. Always has been, always will be.

 

[whitefalcon]

The brumbies need to actually retain some ball or be much much better at their kicking game. Its currently not working.

 

[Pokinacha]

Yeah right, seen it now. IMO that’s deliberate and worse foul play than the incident that was given red. Coles is an out and out filthy cnut. Always has been, always will be.

Don’t disagree but kidneys aren’t a head. He tucked the wing and wasn’t even trying to clean out white. Plus the refs were too busy trying to bin Ikitau

 

[dru]

39% possession?