Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
Just to give some variety to the board and some interesting discussions.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=freaks-and-tweaks
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=freaks-and-tweaks
I dont think that International ironman triathalon has out fo competition drug testing. Lance Armstrong is competing in this sport now, and doing amazingly well. A lot of Cycling forums are questioning how he is so good for so long.If there is significant financial or other rewards involved and somebody is not subject to random out of competition drug testing then you can assume that they are on drugs.
I think it would be reasonably common in amateur sports, I like cycling but can only do so many really hard days in a rown before I need to rest and recover. I could use some sort of drug I guess but dont want to and I would not be cheating as I am not competing in any races. I think a lot of gym junkies would be doing this tooThere doesn't even have to be the financial incentives you mentioned, there is an exponential increase in the amount of individuals who are now on performance enhancing substances purely for aesthetic purposes. This correlates with the huge increase in seizures of the mentioned substances by customs.
A random drug sweep through premier club rugby would throw up some interesting results.
There doesn't even have to be the financial incentives you mentioned..... purely for aesthetic purposes.
they also had a mysterious ability to keep their shirts off while it was cold and raining.
I suppose girls would count as the 'other' kind of rewards.
.
Only if size doesn't count for the girls reward ;-)
I think that's a myth about steroids. Sure, your nads are going to get a bit of shrinkage but I think that's about all that shrinks...
I think that's a myth about steroids. Sure, your nads are going to get a bit of shrinkage but I think that's about all that shrinks...
There are also things you can take to counteract some of the side effects I believe.
But the article's not about drugs, it's (mainly) about surgery. And it makes a very good point: why is taking a drug to increase your endurance bad, but having surgery to increase your strength good?
What if the surgery is elective surgery?