• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Olympic 7's

I like to watch

David Codey (61)
I forgot Coward was in the team until that last minute or so. He was the star of the Oceania.

This is such a trundling team. Too much bland.

We have to move away from this conservative game. Just relying on solid metre eaters (hopefully) then some spark. We looked completely devoid of attacking threat for much of that game. Which is understandable when you only have a couple of strike weapons.

We need to build a 'brand' or style that is Australian and I think that is about being quick and skillful. And I think to help us there we need to rely more on the type of players we see in our professional teams - How can we have more polynesians in our 15s side than our 7s?

Kerevi looked our best 7s player and hes never played 7s (except likely in the villages of Fiji). Puts to bed the theory that you have to play lots of the game to learn it. Perhaps you just need some rugby instinct?

Seru Uru should have been chased for this squad. Droasese. Vidugo (if eligible).

I maintain we should have picked Trae Williams (over Roache most likely) and I thought Nawaqanitawase showed enough at the Oceania to show he could be a weapon - and could answer re-starts.

Of course these guys all have to want to play 7s, but there needs to be a decent salary to it which is hard when I assume income is tied to sponsorship and federal funding which is linked back to success.

I like Walsh and would be prepared to back him but we need to step out of the conservative mode and try to re-imagine what we want from our national team.
if we have a brand atm, it’s the possession team.
he just wants to recycle and keep the ball away from the other team.
im not sure how Coward fits into that philosophy.

coach seems a nice guy, but, to my eye, he got a flyer on the rest of the other nations women’s teams,by having rugby ready players with great touch experience.
year by year, under his control,they deteriorated.

he’s had his chances.
 

Dan54

David Wilson (68)
I think the idea of filling the team with Kerevi's etc is not going to work. Kerevi was good because he played in 2 minute spells seemingly, so really wasn't tested big time on defence etc. I get the idea you have to have a whole diffierent mindset to play the game, and maybe you can get away with quick entrances into game so rest of team mates don't have to work too long helping you in defence etc. That is in no way saying Kerevi couldn't learn it, just I think you have to play a fair bit to be comfortable with it. These boys are only getting a pretty basic wage,(mate's son who was in team a few years back says the most money was made by cashing in air points) so probably you not going to get too many top players from 15s.
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
To everyone saying ‘you’ve gotta be 7s specialist, it won’t work if you bring outsiders in’ - what do you propose? More of the same crap that’s been coming out of the 7s program?

Ignore the details of where the players come from, Australia as a nation has enough brilliant footy players that they should be able to field a seriously strong team for marquee events like the Olympics. Yes pulling together 10 blokes from different codes to train for a few weeks probably isn’t the answer, but if you identify the top talent nation wide over a period of time and put them in camps during off-season etc, it would work.

Not many guys playing NRL, Super Rugby, hell even AFL get a chance to win a gold medal, I’m sure heaps would love the opportunity to be involved.

Kerevi trained with the 7s team for two weeks, he’s a natural footy player and it showed. Remove the 7s purist bias from your heads and you’ll see that some blokes can just play good open space running footy and if we can get them together once every 4 years it’ll become our event to lose.
 

RebelYell

Arch Winning (36)
If we looked at it from just a Rugby perspective, and assumed all Aussie based players would be available, something like this for a 12 player squad wouldn't be bad:

1. Malouf
2. Holland
3. Longbottom
4. McDermott
5. Kerevi
6. Uru
7. Petaia
8. T.Wright
9. Daugunu
10. Samu
11. Banks
12. Hooper
 

Tah Man

Larry Dwyer (12)
Squad needs a good clean out IMO. The old stalwarts of Malouf, Holland, Hutchinson and Anderson are no longer up for it. The only ones who should be guaranteed a spot for next year are Longbottom, Miller and perhaps Roache who I liked the look of. Two very underwhelming Olympics campaigns in a row, time to change it up.
 

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
To everyone saying ‘you’ve gotta be 7s specialist, it won’t work if you bring outsiders in’ - what do you propose? More of the same crap that’s been coming out of the 7s program?

Ignore the details of where the players come from, Australia as a nation has enough brilliant footy players that they should be able to field a seriously strong team for marquee events like the Olympics. Yes pulling together 10 blokes from different codes to train for a few weeks probably isn’t the answer, but if you identify the top talent nation wide over a period of time and put them in camps during off-season etc, it would work.

Not many guys playing NRL, Super Rugby, hell even AFL get a chance to win a gold medal, I’m sure heaps would love the opportunity to be involved.

Kerevi trained with the 7s team for two weeks, he’s a natural footy player and it showed. Remove the 7s purist bias from your heads and you’ll see that some blokes can just play good open space running footy and if we can get them together once every 4 years it’ll become our event to lose.

Sometimes there isn’t a clear and obvious solution to the problem.

Australia isn’t the only country with terrific athletes in other codes and in XVs who could have backfilled the Olympic squad to make those teams better, so i don't think this is a uniquely Australian problem.

Ultimately 7’s just doesn’t have the same money on offer, and whilst i think winning a gold medal would appeal to individuals it doesn’t seem to appeal to those clubs and teams who manage the purse strings, not just in Australia but globally. And the NRL/AFL aren’t about to help out a competing code at the expense of their own product by freeing up their players.

Kerevi is an exception to the norm, but even he lacked the conditioning to be maintained on the pitch for whole games. Yes bring in a few players, but i disagree with the notion that the whole team could be replaced with those unfamiliar with 7s.
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
Peter Fairburn suggested on twitter that the 7’s program as a full time squad may be scrapped after the games due to finances, with players to come from sevens squads and clubs players for future 7’s series.

And to be honest, until they resolve the international travel issues, its hard to see a strong justification to retain it at least for the men. Women’s program will struggle to compete with the NRLW league if they cant travel as well.

likely to only be half a dozen on contracts.

Speaking of contracts, it seems Manenti has signed a 3 year renewal. I would have thought perhaps wait until after the Games to do that?
 

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
It's hard to barrack against Fiji but this Argentinian team is such a joy to watch. Hope they go all the way.
 

eastman

John Solomon (38)
To everyone saying ‘you’ve gotta be 7s specialist, it won’t work if you bring outsiders in’ - what do you propose? More of the same crap that’s been coming out of the 7s program?

Ignore the details of where the players come from, Australia as a nation has enough brilliant footy players that they should be able to field a seriously strong team for marquee events like the Olympics. Yes pulling together 10 blokes from different codes to train for a few weeks probably isn’t the answer, but if you identify the top talent nation wide over a period of time and put them in camps during off-season etc, it would work.

Not many guys playing NRL, Super Rugby, hell even AFL get a chance to win a gold medal, I’m sure heaps would love the opportunity to be involved.

It's a good point- there are more than enough talented 'footballers' and athletes in Australia that we should be consistently in the top echelon of sevens and above the likes of USA and Argentina.

I don't think we need to go to the extent of recruiting AFL or even NRL quality players (and realistically we can't), but there is huge accessible talent in the reserve rugby league comps that hasn't been locked away by NRL club. Some of our best players recently have been inspired recruits from these pools such as Longbottom and Shannon Walker.

We do need to move away from the consistent pale/ stale selections we have seen over the last decade.
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
Also I don't mind using it as a bit of a breading ground of young talent. The likes of Harry Wilson, Isaac Lucas, Will Harrison, Marky Mark (Nawaqanitawase) etc. Give them a year or two apprenticeship under Walsh (or whomever) to really refine their skills (as the likes of Holland, Anstee, O'Donnell, Porch, Anderson etc have shown to various degrees this year). Let them travel the world for a couple of years until they are 21 or so and then unleash them on Super Rugby.
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
Also I don't mind using it as a bit of a breading ground of young talent. The likes of Harry Wilson, Isaac Lucas, Will Harrison, Marky Mark (Nawaqanitawase) etc. Give them a year or two apprenticeship under Walsh (or whomever) to really refine their skills (as the likes of Holland, Anstee, O'Donnell, Porch, Anderson etc have shown to various degrees this year). Let them travel the world for a couple of years until they are 21 or so and then unleash them on Super Rugby.


It's a great idea Reg, the problem currently of course is Harry Wilson gets paid $200k to play Super Rugby for the Reds when he leaves school.

If he chose the 7s pathway he'd have $50 tuckshop money and a free pair of boots.

The entire 7s program needs an overhaul, maybe using it as a Super Rugby feeder is the answer.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
All of this is dependent on COVID getting resolved and the World Series getting back up and running. Until that happens 7s is going to offer very little incentive to be involved. The biggest issue with 7s is that currently it is a choice between becoming a XVs player or a 7s player.

If you look at NZs 7s program they tend to have the experienced players who make a career out of it but then front up for some XVs rugby in the Mitre 10 Cup at the end of the season. They then have some young guys who do it for a couple of years before embarking on a XVs career.

We need to go back to that situation where young guys like Bernard Foley, Sean McMahon, Nick Phipps etc. played some 7s before becoming fulltime XVs players. It needs to be a good part of their development rather than something that will derail their XVs career.

We then need the career guys who like the lifestyle and get remunerated enough. We need something like the NRC back so they can be playing that though so we can always keep a grounding in being a "proper" rugby player and ensure they are of decent standard.

At the moment it really seems like 7s is an option for a bunch of guys who can't really make it elsewhere. Obviously there are guys in our squad where that isn't the case but there are too many players that just aren't up to it at the top level.
 

eastman

John Solomon (38)
The entire 7s program needs an overhaul, maybe using it as a Super Rugby feeder is the answer.
Historically (and recently) this is exactly what it has been; Phipps, Bernard Foley, Sean McMahon, Cameron Clark and others all got their starts in the system.
 
Top