Rugby Mum 2
Bill Watson (15)
Here to help!
@RM 2..didn't see any posts about yesterday's results from the 2's. Did the Joe Boys get up over New?
Here to help!
Thanks RM2, you just gave me my 100th LIKE.
I must go and see what prizes the G&G fairies have for me.
Were you able to video any other games at Joeys yesterday?
The study sounds pretty comprehensive, so could be right. But if I channel my scientific past life I can see some flaws.
The study is based on the individual and the voluntary use of headgear. Straight away there are biases. My thinking is more forwards use headgear and are subject to more collisions. (albeit that backs may have less but are at high speed which may be more dangerous). Also those using headgear may already be prone to concussion hence why they wear it.
A better study which will probably never be undertaken, is where entire matches are played with 30 players all wearing headgear, and against control matches of the entire 30 without headgear. This study is at the match level not the individual level. It has the benefit of double insulation in head clashes. it still may result in the same outcome but would be a very different study and have much more scientific rigor than the one you quote.
I think that the nub of it is that padded headgear spreads the impact on the outside of the skull, so therefore in reduces cuts and skull fractures, but it doesn't reduce the force of the impact on the skull as a whole so that the forces at work INSIDE the skull are unchanged. It's the force of the impact inside the skull which injures the brain in a concussion.
That's my understanding of it anyway, but I'm not a neurosurgeon.
scots an easy win yesterday taking off there Australian Schoolboys representatives at half time
Joeys v NEW (summary) https://twitter.com/JoeysRugby
Joeys 1st XV 27 Newington 1st XV 12
Joeys 2nd XV 34 Newington 2nd XV 10
Joeys 3rd XV 52 Newington 3rd XV 3
Joeys 4th XV 59 Newington 4th XV 0
Joeys 9th XV 15 Newington 5th XV 17
Joeys 10th XV 52 Newington 6th XV 0
Joeys 16A 41 Newington 16A 0
Joeys 16D 46 Newington 16B 19
Joeys 16G 21 Newington 16C 5
Joeys 15A 48 Newington 15A 7
Joeys 15B 57 Newington 15B 5
Joeys 15F 7 Newington 15C 7
Joeys 15G 45 Newington 15D 17
Joeys 14A 33 Newington 14A 0
Joeys 14B 78 Newington 14B 5
Joeys 14E 17 Newington 14C 36
Joeys 14F 36 Newington 14D 35
Joeys 13A 35 Newington 13A 17
Joeys 13B 65 Newington 13B 5
Joeys 13G 36 Newington 13E 15
Fairly typical of the result sheet when any school has played Joeys this year.
Can someone tell me if the joeys referees open themselves up to be referee coached?
As I hear it is all very in house when it comes to joeys refereeing
And while must say I haven't seen too much bad refereeing at joeys . I do think the coaching is very important .
Yep, no doubt. Not lining up with regular 10, Kuenzle, and already being down Kennewell at OC, was a tough break to have to deal with. Cam Murray's effectiveness at 12 not quite so much having to stand in closer at flyhalf; and Sepesa coming forward to play outside centre. But all shades of grey, really, players of this quality.Does anyone realise NEW lost 5/8 5 mins before kick off
It was hot-as over at Hunters Hill yesterday for Joeys match-up against ladder leaders, Newington.
..
Just one or two short bursts, was enjoying the sun most of the time. Recorded a couple of tries from the 16A's, and a couple from the 3s & 2s. Not had a chance to look at any of it yet, but will post them up in due course. Let me know if it was anything specific you were hoping to see.