Joeys won 25 out of 30 games .. and there is a problem?
By my calculations, that is win rate of over 80%, and ignores that there were a number of games where Joeys were matching up against higher Scots teams (eg Joeys 12ths versus Scots 8ths) .. not sure of the Glengary effect?
Either way, Joeys rugby dominance increases as the kids age . makes sense
so my conclusion Joeys programme is "alive and well"
and while yes I agree, Joeys need to do the "post-mortem" . Scots might also need to similarly ask why they didn't do better, outside of the 1st XV
<snip>
Joeys remains the gold standard regardless of the first XV performance cycles and the Arms Race that is being pursued by some other schools.
ARU are in deep doodoo if the Catholic schooling system in general, and Marist Brothers and Jesuits in particular, decide to drop rugby to focus on another winter sport.
Perhaps one of the more mathematically inclined Gaggerlanders could produce a KPI metric similar to the Shute Shield Club Championship calculations to monitor overall School Rugby programme performance, rather than just the performance of the rock-stars in 1st XV, which we have seen can so easily be manipulated with late entries and selective enrolments,
ie 1st XV results accounting for 25% of the overall mark for the School, 2nd XV is 10%, 3rd XV and 4th XV is 5%, 16's is worth 20% (A's 10%, B's 5% and C's 5%), 15's is worth 15%(A's 10%, B's 2.5%, C's 2.5%), and 14's and 13's are worth 10% each (A's 5%, B's 2.5%, C's 2.5%).