I think many of the parents are not the least bit interested in sport of any sort but since it is compulsory they do the one with the least impact on them.
Cricket numbers are not much better.
The anglo/celtic games tradition is dying in the community and its on life support at Grammar.
One suspects that as sport at Grammar declines, some parents/boys with a sporting orientation are choosing another schools and this further weakens sport at Grammar.
Can Grammar do anything to reverse the trend? Has it gone too far to do anything? Or is the school comfortable in its current academic focus and not particularly bothered about sport?
(I'm not criticising the academic focus)
You're right about the decline in the traditional GPS anglo-celtic sports. We see it in most of the GPS schools - the more diverse the student body, the more this applies.
I think grammar is doing all it can.
It has serious professional coaches with excellent CVs in the 3 "big sports".
I think one needs to take a step back and see how it goes against non-GPS schools, including non-Sydney schools, to measure it. I suspect they will go ok in 1sts against st pats. I would expect them to beat Cranbrook.
They have tours to Perth, Singapore and Canberra for rugby from next week so they're trying to introduce the uninitiated to the rugby life that is sometimes only known of if you played the game. I think in the mid term that will become a selling point: I mean, who wants to tour with soccer players?
There is room for the view that the Sydney GPS is just a little too serious for something that you cannot make a living out of and not being competitive at that level may not matter for kids with other fish to fry. And when you read about the training programs some of the schools are doing - not just for rugby but for rowing - I wonder how it is truly healthy to specialize so early.
Each to his own.