Still being discussed amongst the mods. Last one was a disaster.@Joker, just enquiring about a rowing forum, I know most of the schoolboys and probably the old boys would appreciate it, season is just about to begin. Thanks.
Many schools complainedStill being discussed amongst the mods. Last one was a disaster.
Only one joeys boy. Has to be a mistake.
Perhaps the confusion came from your reply to Crashy's question...?Yes that is not me as some people thought. The fella is the photo is one of my best mates.
4 ScotsOnly one joeys boy. Has to be a mistake.
Who would be excluded from this team due to league commitments in the NSW AAGPS Comp
Lemoto, Makasini, Fittler who have been playing with Penrith, Tigers & Roosters but I'm not sure where you land now if it's just lower tier contracts and not a senior contract like Walsh at Auggies who has signed with Manly.Who would be excluded from this team due to league commitments in the NSW AAGPS Comp
MakasiniWho would be excluded from this team due to league commitments in the NSW AAGPS Comp
Some very Very strange selections, not sure what games they watched this year. The problem with Australian rugby often isn’t the players but the poor selectors and coaches who decide who gets a contract.
Very well spoken totally agree it makes sense that they would prioritize players who are finishing school soon, allowing them to gain valuable experience at a higher level. With the talented younger players like Matt Gough and Justice Taumeopaeu coming up, Joeys is definitely setting itself up for a strong future.4 Scots
2 Riverview
2 Shore
2 Kings
2 Newington
1 Joeys
Considering the 2024 Joeys 1st XV had 8 players who weren't in year 12, I think some of them were looked over deliberately, as a lot of the talented Joeys players who could make this team (like Matt Gough and Justice Taumeopaeu) will likely be playing in this team in the next few years (as they will not finish school till next year or even later), so they will prioritise the boys who are about to finish school and are no longer eligible for this team from next year. This enables more boys to get more exposure at the top level to be seen by coaches and get more boys a glimpse at what proffessional union looks like. Next year it is likely Joeys will have the most out of any school in this team, considering the talent they have returning next year, which almost won Joeys the AAGPS playing against boys older than them.
4 Barker
3 St Augstines
4 Nudgee
3 TSS
Taumoepau committed to U16's Waratahs this seasonSome very Very strange selections, not sure what games they watched this year. The problem with Australian rugby often isn’t the players but the poor selectors and coaches who decide who gets a contract.
Massive shame Mitch Woods and Alex Conti not picked as it decreases any chance they’ll return to rugby one day like Matt Rogers, Joseph Sua'ali'i, etc . I know they’re both under Bulldogs contracts and Conti just got injured but to completely leave out the two stars from the dominate NSW U/16 from two years ago is a huge mistake. Also can’t believe Justice Taumoepau and Matt Gough aren’t in this squad.
From who?Best Year 10 players to look out for this season? Heard Shore have a couple strong young guns from their 15A's last year...
Hey mate, I borrowed your data here for the QLD GPS thread. Have attributed approprriately, but not sure if you get a notification.4 Scots
2 Riverview
2 Shore
2 Kings
2 Newington
1 Joeys
Considering the 2024 Joeys 1st XV had 8 players who weren't in year 12, I think some of them were looked over deliberately, as a lot of the talented Joeys players who could make this team (like Matt Gough and Justice Taumeopaeu) will likely be playing in this team in the next few years (as they will not finish school till next year or even later), so they will prioritise the boys who are about to finish school and are no longer eligible for this team from next year. This enables more boys to get more exposure at the top level to be seen by coaches and get more boys a glimpse at what proffessional union looks like. Next year it is likely Joeys will have the most out of any school in this team, considering the talent they have returning next year, which almost won Joeys the AAGPS playing against boys older than them.
4 Barker
3 St Augstines
4 Nudgee
3 TSS
Scots is 5 - TB, ZF, LJ, HL & JM4 Scots
2 Riverview
2 Shore
2 Kings
2 Newington
1 Joeys
Considering the 2024 Joeys 1st XV had 8 players who weren't in year 12, I think some of them were looked over deliberately, as a lot of the talented Joeys players who could make this team (like Matt Gough and Justice Taumeopaeu) will likely be playing in this team in the next few years (as they will not finish school till next year or even later), so they will prioritise the boys who are about to finish school and are no longer eligible for this team from next year. This enables more boys to get more exposure at the top level to be seen by coaches and get more boys a glimpse at what proffessional union looks like. Next year it is likely Joeys will have the most out of any school in this team, considering the talent they have returning next year, which almost won Joeys the AAGPS playing against boys older than them.
4 Barker
3 St Augstines
4 Nudgee
3 TSS
Not trying to sound rude but I don't understand why it's considered complicated. More sides yes, but the boys selected for Aus Schools weren't going to be selected in this squad unless 3 or 4 players in a position get injured. 40 players named in the squad above this is the National 1st and 2nd XV. Aus Schools have remained in name but they are essentially the 3rd XV with any Barbarian side named being the 4th XV.Scots is 5 - TB, ZF, LJ, HL & JM
Kings is 4 - HL, IF, LF & EL(23)
The representation from the other schools has been affected by the Aus Schools playing Fiji in Sep.
Unnecessarily complicated pathways...