Barker won the 2nds 17/03rds Newington def Barker 5 tries to 2
2nds Newington def Barker 17-0
1sts Barker def Newington 63-14
I'm not so sure about your analysis here. Certainly my observations of someone who had a son in Years 7 and 8 during the last 2 years of the previous DOR, was that he was interested in the whole age group. In those years we had the same number of teams as other schools so we matched up As to Fs all the way down, so there was no question about playing lower grade teams to achieve results and we won most games every week.
Obviously in the higher ages where Newington may have had less teams that the opposition then, it's not unusual that the lowest Newington team would play the lowest team from another school even though one might be C or D and the other might be F or G. It's a situation which continues, the purpose of which is to reduce mismatches which benefit neither the team which wins by 50 or the team which loses by 50.
Possibly you are also unaware of the situation regarding the current 5ths, where the DOR has allowed a group of Year 12 boys to select their own team (even though quite a few should be playing 3rds or 4ths). This weakens the 3rds and 4ths and will prove an issue later on I suspect when the GPS starts and when TAS combine with Newington, which means that the Newington 5ths often play the 8ths or 9ths of other schools.
Additionally, both of the Prep schools have their own Sportsmaster and rugby coaches, so any "involvement" of the current DOR would be largely PR and box ticking rather than having any real impact. My son went to one of the preps and there was no particular need for the DOR to do anything.
Barker won the 2nds 17/0
I heard on grspevine 31/21 to View but Scots played a man down for last 15 min due to a redAnyone manage to catch Riverview vs Scots today? All I know is that the Wolfpack was victorious but I would like a rundown of the match please and thank you.
TME
News best were. 3 Tom Maclean. 14 Seluini Fakaosifolau who got no clean ball. The New scrum needs work. More often they were on roller skates on their own feed. Billy zdickens the 9 had a pretty decent game. His passes were direct and quick. Defence is a problem . Given they were a bigger team than Barker they just were not dominant at the tackle. I will say this they came up against a well coached and very fit Barker team who have some real class players. Let’s see how the season pans out for New. If they were missing some players from last weeks game against Waves that could be a factor.
News best were. 3 Tom Maclean. 14 Seluini Fakaosifolau who got no clean ball. The New scrum needs work. More often they were on roller skates on their own feed. Billy zdickens the 9 had a pretty decent game. His passes were direct and quick. Defence is a problem . Given they were a bigger team than Barker they just were not dominant at the tackle. I will say this they came up against a well coached and very fit Barker team who have some real class players. Let’s see how the season pans out for New. If they were missing some players from last weeks game against Waves that could be a factor.
Hi Rod, hope you are well rugby comrade,
Very surprised that this Barker team have some real class players, apart from Ned Slack Smith, who is tremendous!
All through the A age groups absolutely not the case, so what has suddenly changed, it's an astonishing turn around, I remember in the 15as, so not that long ago, Barker losing to Waves 81-0 at Barker on no 1 !
Suspect we will see next week v Joeys and v Riverview.
3 to go Joeys lead 50 to 12. Have seen enough.
Yes, we're pretty much in agreement.
On Lindfield, the current Sportsmaster their is Mick Adams who has played a lot of 1st grade for both Manly and Warringah and I'd doubt that there's anything that LF could teach him about coaching or organisation.
Curiously Newington have allowed him to be assistant coach of St Augustine's 1st XV, which I find baffling in the extreme.
News best were. 3 Tom Maclean. 14 Seluini Fakaosifolau who got no clean ball. The New scrum needs work. More often they were on roller skates on their own feed. Billy zdickens the 9 had a pretty decent game. His passes were direct and quick. Defence is a problem . Given they were a bigger team than Barker they just were not dominant at the tackle. I will say this they came up against a well coached and very fit Barker team who have some real class players. Let’s see how the season pans out for New. If they were missing some players from last weeks game against Waves that could be a factor.
Plenty to understand WLF. Namely, boys mature, get bigger and change. Plenty in the team been there since Year 7, and lots have improved with good coaching. Yes, a couple of new boys this year (9 & 10), however the core of the team have been at Barker for a while. I remember the 81-0 score line too, we had a 60-0 against Trinity that year too, then beat them in the 15’s. Do you remember the score in the 16A’s mate, we weren’t far from knocking you off..
Thanks WTF, I am very pleased that it's the core of boys who have been there so long, much too much talk about newcomers from other people, and yes I agree boys change and get coached better.
I do remember that 16as game very vividly as you do, the game never got going! History now.
You will get a good feeling as to how Barker are going next week v Joeys. By some accounts Knox could have won their game v Joeys, only a try in it, so Knox are unexpectedly the real deal this year!
To which I would add that there has been zero attempt to develop any players outside A teams all the way through. Potential late developers aren't even on the radar as boys are pigeon-holed in 13s. The HOR probably has no idea how good some of the boys playing 5ths are (and how good some of them could have been if he had paid them any attention or provided any form of individual development) because he would barely have noticed them let alone thought that it might be a good idea to develop more than 15-20 boys in each age group.
The proof of this is surely that between the start of Year 7 and the start of Year 10 about 40-50% of players stop playing rugby at the school. That's some achievement.
Noticed kings got smashed by joeys, was wondering if this was because of the cadet camp? If not how are they shaping up this year?
No doubt the cadet camp had a bit to do with it as they couldn't train and got straight off the bus from Singleton and into the warm up.
As for the second part of your question they are a young team, not many year 12s in the mix. That didn't seem to bother them in the rowing though, the next few 'trials' will probably be a bit more revealing than the first two.