Of course. But imagine the comments some would be making if roles were reversed and a Newington team suddenly became competitive with an influx of boarders.
I think most of us (maybe not Big Papi) are over the days of accusing other schools of handing out scho******ps or im****ing (I’m sure you can fill in the blanks).
The way I see it, you can’t expect each age group to remain stagnant in ability and competitiveness from year to year. Of course, schools will get in new students here and there, but the main thing to remember is that we are talking about teenage boys here - players will grow and develop as the years go on, and, undoubtedly, some more than others.
Can you expand on why the coaching has improved interested in what they have done and who deserves a wrap.
I don’t have any specific names but all I know is that the school has taken a different approach to this age group, seeing how close they are to competing in the opens competition. My nephew tells me there is a higher level of accountability coming from both leaders within the team and from the coaches. Another thing he tells me they are focussed on doing is getting the basics down pat - set pieces, as I hear, have been a major focus at trainings and it would seem that it’s been working well for them.
But still, this age group at view still has a way to go, and we saw that today through their loss to Newington.