WLF
Arch Winning (36)
I agree. Im not here to argue whether Harrison is better than Donaldson or vice versa. But it seems clear to me that Aust selectors had decided that Harrison was their first choice for 10 and requested that NSW play Donaldson and Woodcock at 15 to see whether they may be options for that position. Which turned out well for Donaldson, all things considered ie playing 15 would have to have been better than not making schoolboys at all.
.
Rich_E and HTR,
I think we all agree this is an argument difficult to prove because it depends on the players, selectors opinions etc.
But on this particular conversation I will add some more context.
Firstly Bell,Donaldson and Harrison had all played together for the Randwick juniors for many years, side by side, and that team actually won the NSW state Championships several times. The point is they had a fabulous winning combo.
IMO the back line in last years AS had a problem at Inside centre and it just didn't work. So for selectors to assume, without playing in the trials that a boy was a given is ridiculous, I do think however that Harrison is a (great player) but should have gone to IC. You might remember when Donaldson finally went to 10, the backs looked much more fluent, and he is not a 15.
So to say at least a player made it, in a position that clearly isn't his best, isn't the answer in my opinion. ie if you are serious about winning.
The bottom line is we lost, to a better side, but we never really fired a shot.
I also disagree that it doesn't matter who plays beside you, I think it certainly does.
After school rep footy there will be plenty of time to play with different people and further develop.
If this discussion is about picking winning teams at schoolboy level, then my choice is to pick winning combinations.
The GPS combination choices are very good.