Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
It was for them.
That's like saying "Its always in the last place you look!"
Well you're not going to keep fucking looking once you've found it, right?
It was for them.
Yeah but I've got a reason - I'm actually making a cogent argument.
You're just being a sore winner.
Get your hand off it. "Oh x team beat y team that beat z team so x must be better than y!"
Pfitzy.come on mate.this was a great close GF which home team won...
ARU needs desparately some outside help from some decent consultants.and stop having the old school private school GPS rugby brigade running the show who clearly limit the potential from what is the game played in heaven.
I guess that is the point.they need more help than just a PR firm as that does not help them operationally..marketing consultancy is where they clearly need help..NRC is marketed as third tier..morons..
OK this is now getting off topic, but:
Anyone with half a brain wouldn't go near an ARU job right now.
The problem ultimately is that the Wallabies are a separate entity from everything else, and they're not winning right now.
The franchises directly supporting them have no public profile outside rugby people. The NRC and Club Rugby has barely any public profile at all.
But the key point to be made is this:
Other organisations - NRL, FFA, AFL, CA - all have political agendas as well. The difference is their agendas, while still political, only conflict in the method - they still have the same aim of making the sport more powerful through financial means.
In rugby, the agendas seem to have no bearing on a successful outcome relating to improving the net position, but just to score fucking useless political points at the expense of someone else, and the game as a whole.