hi-jinks said:
Cutter, that is a lame argument! Everyone was a better player than Gleeson!!! :lmao:
You deadset have your hand on it with McCormack though. Did you not see that image of his kick return in the Tahs game? Crick would do that week in week out for Gordon. Cricky was deceptively big, he was 110kg.
I am starting to sound like his agent!! Deadset, I am shattered we didn't see the best of him, no other front rower has ever had his athletic gift.
A hookers primary role is at the set piece and in tight. Crick taught Nathan Sharpe how to stand in the centres. He was so busy looking for kick returns and hit ups, he neglected the tight play. I'm sure a succession of his coaches will tell you the same thing.
Athleticism isnt the only key to being a great rugby player. I agree Crick was an athlete, I dont agree he was a great rugby player.