Wow - interesting stuff in there mxyzptik - so are you able to watch 6N rugby in your neck of the woods??
6N are against bonus points because teams either have two games at home and three away — or vice-versa.
They think that the teams with three home games in any year have an inherent advantage and that a bonus point system would only magnify that.
Just saying …
OK mate - so tell me that you are putting your hand up to write on 6 Nations this year. You could write 400 words no problem at all.
Anybody else ??
.
Five point bonus for a GS sorts that.^^I read an article last year about the bonus points, they were worried that a team could win a Grand Slam but lose the six nations. A mathematical possibility but highly unlikely.
The reason I gave about why they didn't have a bonus point system came from the fellow running 6N.
Another variation could be that they have a bonus points system and the usual tie-breakers, but with the proviso that Grand Slam winners always win the competition regardless.
mxyzptik - I will contact you about 6N writing.
.
Do you know how much it has rained in Britain and Ireland this winter? Glasgow will probably not play another game at their home ground until next season such is the terrible damage done by the feet of rain that have fallen. The idea teams are going to play like the Fijian sevens team when the prevailing conditions resemble the battle of Passchendaele is a little fanciful. I would bring in BPs to the six nations btw with a five point bonus for a GS, simples.Speaking of bonus points, did you see this article from Thursday on ESPN Scrum? It's from John Taylor, a former Wales and B&I Lions flanker 40-some years back. He responds to 6N CEO John Feehan's claim that a bonus points system would be inherently unfair.
The takeaway is that he thinks a bonus points system would encourage the kind of attacking rugby that we saw on the last day of the 2015 6N, and that it's necessary if Europe is ever going to catch up with the Southern Hemisphere. The dominance-oriented attritional style currently encouraged in the tournament just leaves tier 1 European sides under-prepared to compete with the rest of the tier 1 nations. He probably has a point.
And given when Argentina, Japan, and even teams like Canada are trying to do, creative, attacking rugby is the way the world is going. Even if it does eventually swing back to set piece-oriented grudge matches, the teams who developed some kind of attacking style during this period will be better prepared to take their chances in those attritional games.
So, if SH rugby is so far ahead I am sure they would welcome the suggestion that the requirement to forego a summer break and full pre season is share equally between NH and SH.
As for excuses, every loss by SH teams in November is explained away as fatigue after a long season. NH players play a lot more games than SH players, they miss out on a summer break for the RWC and the best in Britain and Ireland have another of theirs severely compromised touring with the Lions to keep the show on the road for the SH unions who would be skint without the Lions. When we see the same dominance with the two hemispheres being treated equitably then I will believe that Australia and South African rugby players are so much better than NH players. NZ are on a different level I will freely accept. EDIT as for Argentina tearing Ireland a new one, injuries were a massive factor, our outside centre played the game with a broken jaw FFS and that is before you start with the loss of POC, POM, TOD, Sexton, Payne, Healy playing when not even close to fitness etc. And lest we forget, Australia were an appalling refereeing decision, from a Southern Hemisphere referee, from being kicked out of the tournament by Scotland so I wouldn't say that reinforces the Hemisphere as being some sort of master race.
Ireland beat Aus in the last RWC. Our record against SA and Aus is very competitive in November internationals as well. As I said previously, NZ are in a different league to everyone else, but the next seven teams are very close and results outside of this latest RWC, which was played in freakishly hot and dry conditions for a British September/ October, indicate as much.The same old..
The facts remain the same. The NH win ration failed to improve even with the Saffas have Pieter DeVilliers "coaching" and the Wallabies having cryptic Robbie in charge. I do not think I have ever seen a SH side excusing the few defeats as due to "fatigue". As for the Scotland game, it was indeed close, but at real time and in replay I still think he was offisde and it was a penalty. Do not forget that it has between Joubert and Owens who is the best referee for a few years.
Anyway if your players are fatiqued to the point they are no longer competitive in test Rugby, which I have feared would happen since the mid 2000's then I would suggest you get your clubs under control with regard to player welfare and the pre-eminence of test rugby and also get them to agree to a global season. I know neither of these tings will happen, so I fear that we will see test Rugby degraded in the same way that football/soccer play "friendlies" now.
World rugby didn't agree. I genuinely don't think it affected the result, I thought Scotland had opportunities to win the game regardless which they didn't take, but to claim Aus did not enjoy a bit of luck is disingenuous to say the least.Come close, tpp, no closer than that: JOUBERT'S DECISION WAS CORRECT! That's from a former ref.
Then why mention it in the first place?World rugby didn't agree. I genuinely don't think it affected the result, I thought Scotland had opportunities to win the game regardless which they didn't take, but to claim Aus did not enjoy a bit of luck is disingenuous to say the least.
To demonstrate that Aus needed a good bit of luck to beat Scotland who are one of the weaker sides in the six nations.Then why mention it in the first place?
Lähetetty minun SM-G388F laitteesta Tapatalkilla
Indeed, these things balance out over the course of a game but the injuries suffered by Ireland and Wales, in particular, certainly were not balanced out over the course of the tournament.There was also the case of Joubert incorrectly ruling a scrum to Scotland instead of a penalty to Aus which resulted in a Scottish try that everyone just ignored.