It was probably the best "game" I have seen in the NRC so far, but I am getting over this tackling optional stuff, big hits at times, but average defense
Also I don't see how producing a hybrid game that works to Aus's strengths whilst ignoring our weaknesses is helpful in the medium to long term
Yes, we can play tackle optional fast and loose rugby, but real rugby is about competing for the ball and especially at set piece, and ruck time, and maul time
How exactly is it a 'hybrid' game? Which game is it being split with? Don't say League because that's clearly not the cases. The law variations have had very little structural effect on the game. The scrims have been clean and performed in a timely manner. The lineouts have been good. The refs are enforcing the need to actually attempt to throw the ball in straight. Even the ruck has been good which often tends to be the main issue non Rugby fans gripe about. Hell,
there have been a number of tries scored from driving mauls. Sure looks like Rugby.
As for the defence. There were 7 tries scored last night in comparison to the 10 in the first round and 9 in the second. Defences could be stiffer but when you go down this path you find mismatches and they get exploited. As those players who are one of mismatches he's improve that will improve. However, it's not as if the defences in many of the ITM Cup games are much better. A number of the Currie Cup games have been try fests as well.
There's a lot of adjustment going on here. Both players and coaches are bedding in to a whole new level of play one that is played at a cracking pace.
Finally, I find the skills comment a little odd. So far the three TV games have been in the wet. That will have adverse effect in that regard.