Wilson
Phil Kearns (64)
I think that might depend on specific contract terms, but either way I'm guessing he'll hang around in bath, particularly if McMahon or pocock are fit. This deal seems to have been done in very good will and I doubt they'll force the issue unless he is really desperately needed. If it was a regulation 9 window I'd expect it would be different.Test window availability doesn't hold for Houston, he's on a short-term loan at the grace and favour of the Reds/ARU. As he has an Oz contract he stays as long, or short, as his Oz employer wishes. I reckon he'd be on match payments at Bath, playing for the Wallabies isn't going to cost Leroy anything.