Also IIRC the Maori team have a silver fern, as does the ladies. They even call them the black ferns don't they ,even though they have a silver fern on a black jumper?You can do whatever you guys like with your Super Rugby jerseys but please leave the NZ ones alone. The silver fern is reserved for just one jersey in rugby and that jersey is All Black..
When the Wobs are playing, all interstate/inter franchise rubbish should be set aside in the national interest. I am, You are, we are Australian.
Tell that to the selectors.
I'm sorry Scotty but I've had enough of this bullshit. I'm not saying you are the only one who has made this claim but the fact of the matter is just because you are personally not happy with the team selection doesn't mean that there exists some behind-the-curtain secret agenda of the wallabies selectors to ensure that Waratahs are picked.
Dingo gets the final say and I'm sure he couldn't give a flying fuck where the players are from and even if he did it goes against all logic that he would deliberately pick players he thought would not perform. It's not like there's enough people calling for his head already.
/rant
Also IIRC the Maori team have a silver fern, as does the ladies. They even call them the black ferns don't they ,even though they have a silver fern on a black jumper?
Pretty sure that the NZ Schoolboys have a silver fern. Going back far enough, I think I have seen a NZ Universities rugby team jumper with a silver fern on it.
The precious silver fern is not reserved for just one jumper in rugby. Plenty of teams apart from the NZ Open Mens Rugby team wear a silver fern on their rugby jumpers.
There is also a whole bunch of silver ferns on the uniforms of the NZ Olympians.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/olympics/photos/7189763/NZ-Olympic-uniforms
I was just posting in response to 'all interstate/inter franchise rubbish should be set aside in the national interest'.
Can you tell me, hand on heart, that it doesn't appear the Tahs players have been favoured, when you consider their form? In fact they have been favoured in three ways:
1. By the scheduling in June that meant it was always likely there would be more Tahs selected to play the first Wales test (and we all thought the second Wales test would be our No. 1 team, but it turns out we just gave the same blokes another couple of games).
2. By the fact that some are clearly out of form, or at least below the standard of their competitors in many positions (TPN, Timani, Horne - you could even make a case against Robinson and AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)).
3. By the fact that Deans is using lack of fitness as a reason not to pick Cooper, but at the same time picking Mitchell who is in the same position. Not to mention that TPN and Timani are clearly not up to 80 minutes of super rugby let alone test rugby.
The reality with Quade Cooper is that he missed out on a bench spot because we picked a 5th forward, not because of Drew Mitchell.
It may well be true that Deans doesn't consider his fitness suitable for playing 80 minutes of test rugby.
With McCabe injured it was always going to be either Barnes and Fainga'a or Cooper and Barnes. Barnes was never not going to be in the starting team after the series against Wales.
Do you really think that there is a Tahs bias going on in the Wallabies?
Deans mentioned Cooper's fitness, but conveniently ignored the fact of Mitchell's. Why why why?
Not really, but I can't guarantee that there isn't based on the selections and form we have seen this year.
I was just posting in response to 'all interstate/inter franchise rubbish should be set aside in the national interest'.
Can you tell me, hand on heart, that it doesn't appear the Tahs players have been favoured, when you consider their form? In fact they have been favoured in three ways:
1. By the scheduling in June that meant it was always likely there would be more Tahs selected to play the first Wales test (and we all thought the second Wales test would be our No. 1 team, but it turns out we just gave the same blokes another couple of games).
2. By the fact that some are clearly out of form, or at least below the standard of their competitors in many positions (TPN, Timani, Horne - you could even make a case against Robinson and AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)).
3. By the fact that Deans is using lack of fitness as a reason not to pick Cooper, but at the same time picking Mitchell who is in the same position. Not to mention that TPN and Timani are clearly not up to 80 minutes of super rugby let alone test rugby.
"Quade quite obviously is not at the top of his fitness yet, but he is back in the game, which is great.
"He's been training with us for two of the last three weeks, which is good. The first week he sat out because he was not fully fit. He's had a couple of club games, which is good. He's working hard. He was obviously an option, but in the end it's pretty straightforward."
Asked what Cooper had to do to get back in the Test team, Deans said: "Keep doing what he's doing. Keep working with us.
"It will unfold over time. There is not a lot of certainty in this industry.
"I've got no doubt he will get an opportunity again, absolutely.
"It's good that he is back now training with us. He is picking up the content and working hard on his physical state."
So the first week of training, Cooper was injured and couldn't train. That definitely says something.
In terms of Mitchell he said the following:
"His experience was important," Deans said. "We needed cover in the outside backs. That was the key need and he was the best for the job.
"He returned to the ground some time ago. You do need that top end sharpness as an outside back and he's been working hard at that. He's making progress.
"In terms of his best state, he's not there, but he is well underway. His experience in this sort of cauldron is valuable."
So he has stated that Mitchell isn't quite there yet. Obviously he has been considered close enough to 'there' to be a viable bench option.
I think Cooper would have also been 'there' if we'd gone for a 4-3 split.