A degree of caution between the Randwick and UNSW proposed JV needs to be taken. Sydney Uni can demonstrate they are able to meet every requirement of a team in this comp already barring a ground suitable for broadcasting.
Nobody knows how the JV will go, if it will be successful, what UNSW are bringing to the table, etc. Sure Randwick have thrown a Uni's name in there. But what's their history with High Performance programs, etc.
Dear Train,
with respect, nobody other than the ARU knows how any of the bids are going to go at the new 3T level or what they are all bringing to the table.
What the ARU have done is to invite all comers to strut their stuff, ie to make submissions. That happens a a lot in commerce. Typically an
evaluation panel then review the submissions and undertake due diligence. If they like most parts of a bid they usually liaise and work out whether that Consortia can improve or overcome their short comings.
I agree that caution needs to be taken.
As best I can tell, Randwick have been working to this for 2 years. UNSW first sponsored Randwick at the Singapore 7s in 2012. I reckon the ARU will know what all parties are bringing to the table.
If you add more "ifs" into the scenario, of course you can construct any outcome you wish to dream up. For example, if Jeff Sayle insists on playing again Randwick will not have hope....
I am just happy that there is a positive move to improve Rugby in Australia. With positive momentum, changes can be made and errors corrected. Before this was announced, we were all whinging that it was going backwards. I don't think Pulver will start this without a high level of confirnace that it will last.
Get ready to enjoy the Rugby and to barracking for Randwick.