SouthernX
John Thornett (49)
Sorry I don’t understand what you are saying? NZRU gave them money to give to the Oz teams?
I thought Hamish McLennan played hard ball with NzRU and said we need a bigger slice of the pie and then the kiwis caved
Sorry I don’t understand what you are saying? NZRU gave them money to give to the Oz teams?
The Rebels in fact do take a moral objection to sports betting (or at least it's advertising) as partners to the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation:lol, gambling will be fine. It will never be banned. Rugby doesn’t take a moral objection to gambling, there is just no interest from the gambling companies in Aus for Rugby
I don't see that happening. AFL teams in Victoria have been getting out of pokies, they likely see the writing on the wall at a state government level. While they've still got some time to run it costs money to get into them which is something the Rebels just don't have.i agree with you Wilson…
but if a betting agency or pokie club somehow saved the rebels. I would be the first person to turn a blind eye because all the other codes do it
No it’s because they are reliant on government money and no sports betting agency is interested in sponsoring themThe Rebels in fact do take a moral objection to sports betting (or at least it's advertising) as partners to the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation:
View attachment 18188
This is what people are generally talking about when "bans" on sports betting are discussed - restrictions on the advertising, particularly around and during sporting events. The current odds integrated into the broadcast model that NRL work with does not have long left.
FWIW I back this stance by the Rebels, I think they're on the right side of this one.
Also VIC Govt are a major sponsor of Rebels through TAC, wouldn't be surprised if one of the conditions is that they cant sign a better agency. They’re pretty standard to includes those kinds of conditions in sponsorships.No it’s because they are reliant on government money and no sports betting agency is interested in sponsoring them
Yep, there is no moral objection. They are financially dependent on the government.Also VIC Govt are a major sponsor of Rebels through TAC, wouldn't be surprised if one of the conditions is that they cant sign a better agency. They’re pretty standard to includes those kinds of conditions in sponsorships.
I’d be happy if all teams signed up to anti gambling campaigns, but like you say the reality is that there isn’t the same $$ in gambling for rugby domestically.Yep, there is no moral objection. They are financially dependent on the government.
You can also clearly see with how few markets are offered on rugby betting agencies don’t see it as that profitable
Finally putting meaning behind the name Rebels.I'd be happy with tobacco, gambling and white heroin as sponsors if it meant having a viable club and competition.
Ice would have a broader appeal I think.I'd be happy with tobacco, gambling and white heroin as sponsors if it meant having a viable club and competition.
Get Bomber Thompson on board he has a frozen water businessIce would have a broader appeal I think.
Fuck me and I thought the only way the Rebels could hurt me was emotional pain. Imagine being destitute because of this shit team
Someone may be able to correct me, but I believe directors can be held accountable for any debts incurred after an organisation first becomes insolvent - this date is established by the liquidators after review of the books.Surely RA step in somehow? That's quite incredible negligence on the part of the directors. They can't have known they would be held personally liable?