• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Melbourne Rebels 2024

Wallaby Man

Nev Cottrell (35)
My issue with the Sua'ali'i deal and others that preceded it is less about the cash splashed on in, and more about the signal it gives to grafters in the game that their work ethic and commitment is of less value than a punt on an unproven player.
1 player on average for every 150 signed is not a precedent.
 

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
What if the game opened up due to fatigue?

I sit and watch some pretty ordinary batting from the Australian side for 8 hours in December/January.
Having played and watched plenty of rubbish February rugby it's the dropped ball that kills it

For some reason the dew/humidity/sweat/mud combo just makes the ball so slippery.
 

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
Outside of Suva it's really only an issue in Brisbane. And Brisbane's peak humidity period in in Jan/Feb is less than what they are in Suva for the current Super Rugby schedule.

Late Jan/Early February in Brisbane is the main issue with humidity. Nov/Dec is about the same as Mar/Apr, so if the humidity is going to play a critical factor in the quality of the game (I don't think it is), then they just could just schedule fewer games in Brisbane in Jan/Feb and shift them to the Nov/Dec & Mar/Apr periods.


Compare the Chance of Muggy Conditions in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, Suva, and Auckland.png
 
Last edited:

Adam84

Rod McCall (65)
Outside of Suva it's really only an issue in Brisbane. And Brisbane's peak humidity period in in Jan/Feb is less than what they are in Suva for the current Super Rugby schedule.

Late Jan/Early February in Brisbane is the main issue with humidity. Nov/Dec is about the same as Mar/Apr, so if the humidity is going to play a critical factor in the quality of the game (I don't think it is), then they just could just schedule fewer games in Brisbane in Jan/Feb and shift them to the Nov/Dec & Mar/Apr periods.


View attachment 18555

The Drua actually use this to their advantage. it was leaked last year that they water the ground the night before to ensure peak humidity the next day for the visiting teams
 

Derpus

Nathan Sharpe (72)
For the record, I have zero interest in sitting at Suncorp Stadium anytime in December and January, watching players skills disappear due to the extreme fatigue from the heat and humidity.
This is wrongo. Rugby's current issue is the lack of fatigue due to the bench size.
 

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
This is wrongo. Rugby's current issue is the lack of fatigue due to the bench size.
The thing is, during summer this will be managed by increasing the number of stoppages and water breaks.

The players won't just miss more tackles. They will make more of all the mistakes. More scrums etc


Games will take longer with more ball-out-of-play time. It doesn't solve the current issue
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
I honestly believe that RA do not actually want the Rebels to survive as they fully support the shrink to greatness model.
Completely agree.

I think RA would be thrilled for the Rebels to continue if they were financially viable.

I just don't see any evidence of this, it looks like an opportunity they wish to take - cutting the number of teams where the RA deflects responsibility to the actions of others. I don't like it but they are not wrong.

Unfortunately the issue with Rebels goes far beyond the number of teams favoured and seems to potentially challenge the existence of RA/pro rugby itself. Survival of the professional game trumps survival of 5 teams. (Let alone my preferred position of expansion within a domestic comp. Very likely that bird has flown.)
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
So if the Rebels were making money you think RA would want to cut them?

I think they lean on the the level of sporting success. And a desire to concentrate the talent to encourage better success. Commercially successful teams without sporting success is not what the RA want and I suspect the shrink to greatness policy has sympathy at RA.

Edit: FWIW i don't disagree with a position that wants sporting success and a level playing field for the comp. Shrinkage is just not how I would go about it and nor is an intermeshed comp with the Kiwis. A post season champions league would be fine but not a meshed (lop-sided) comp.
 

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
I disagree… If Rebels (and all OZ Super Rugby teams) were a commercial success there would be zero talk of cutting teams, regardless of the on-field results
There's a difference between commercial success and possible existence. Look at Newcastle in the Premiership.
 

swingpass

Peter Sullivan (51)
its pretty clear that ALL the super franchises are struggling financially, the Canes posted a 1.4 million NZD loss last year. Quite simply there is no format that will deliver a full time, fully professional game in Australia at the wages level (relative to income) players want. We are just kicking the can down the road hoping the B&I Lions and RWC can deliver a financial miracle. A nation wide semi pro comp with our best playing in Europe, Japan (NZ?) is the only sustainable foreseeable future imo. I love the Rebels and would dearly love them to survive, but i cant see that happening. the question is who goes next? Brumbies or Tahs ? Should be the latter but much more likely the former
 
Top