I think you've got your blinkers on again Slim.
White is only in his first year... it will be interesting where they're both at in a year or so...
so do I - thats why I limited the comparison to last year.I still rate burgess higher.
I agree completely with this.
I think White is a huge talent. At 21 with little experience he should improve in leaps and bounds in the next two years.
I just think at this stage, if Genia and White are both in top form there is still a massive gulf in their ability.
At their best (and Genia finally played a good game this weekend), I would say it is Genia first, daylight second, then White, McKibbin, Sheehan, then more daylight, dusk, evening, dawn, more daylight, rinse and repeat a few more times and then Phipps.
I think the backup halfback spot is still up for grabs and what is certain is that all the candidates are a long way behind where Luke Burgess was when he left Australian rugby.
I agree completely with this.
I think White is a huge talent. At 21 with little experience he should improve in leaps and bounds in the next two years.
I just think at this stage, if Genia and White are both in top form there is still a massive gulf in their ability.
"I was just trying to think about Genia at his best, and compare him with White at his best...
And all that really separates them is experience... so I don't think there's much of a gap there at all...
Think about it...how do we know that Sarel wouldn't have played as well, if not better, than McKibben did in past few weeks? Sarel's apparent deficiencies would have been compensated in other areas, and Barnes has kicked a couple of goals when McKibben went off, one at least from the sideline if my memory serves me right...
Sarel could well have had a greater impact than McKibben did in yesterday's match...