Lyndon Bray under fire now

[Spook]

This is becoming a circus. Bray is under fire for suggesting Giteau should be suspended and influencing the judicial process via intimidation.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/referees-boss-under-fire-for-saying-giteau-should-go/story-e6frg7ox-1225859620955

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/super-14/dud-decision-giteau-5000-the-poorer-for-telling-it-like-it-is-20100428-tsja.html

 

[Biffo]

Lovely cast of characters, isn't it? Walsh, Bray, Giteau and Growden as the principals.

 

[Spook]

Lovely cast of characters, isn't it? Walsh, Bray, Giteau and Growden as the principals.

and Wayne Smith. I rate him.

 

[Biffo]

Lovely cast of characters, isn't it? Walsh, Bray, Giteau and Growden as the principals.

and Wayne Smith. I rate him.

OK. Walsh, Bray, Giteau, Growden, Smith. Spot the odd man out.

 

[Spook]

Lovely cast of characters, isn't it? Walsh, Bray, Giteau and Growden as the principals.

and Wayne Smith. I rate him.

OK. Walsh, Bray, Giteau, Growden, Smith. Spot the odd man out.

I can see more than one.

 

[chief]

As Scarfman said in another thread, Lyndon Bray wouldn't last two rounds under this new process. I think it was very wrong for Bray to say comments like that, it certainly wasn't his position to do so.

 

[Scarfman]

Cheers for the props, but I think Bray has the right to suggest that Giteau's comments about his REFEREE were out of line. I think the way Bray said it (sneaky) shows that he's no genius, though. I would have said: "We believe Giteau ought to get a fine and I hope to present evidence to the disciplinary board." Etc.