Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
semantics.
Did he plead guilty, or was he found guilty ? no.
Did he have to admit to the offence to enter,and then to successfully complete the diversionary program? Yes
Here's a better link
https://www.qld.gov.au/law/legal-me...ting-disputes-out-of-court/justice-mediation/
The Section 10 is a demonstration that guilt can be found,with no conviction recorded,so you have gone off in a tangent there.
But, back to KHunt.
How should he treated by the court system?
I say no less leniently than his team mate.
The Law is about the wording of the legislation and the procedure. So yes it is semantics.
The fact is Hunt entered a plea of guilty to an offence. Cooper entered no plea and the charges were not tested. Do you know what the contents of the mediation were? Of course not it is strictly confidential.
As for the Tangent of the NSW Sect. 10 you raised it to prove that other people charged can have their matters dismissed with no conviction recorded. I was pointing out for the board that the functionality of Section 10 is significantly different to the Qld diversionary mediation process. Indeed even if matter are dismissed under Section 10 (1) and no conviction is recorded, the very fact that this section was used for the offence is a matter of record, as is the plea of guilty.
Semantics yes, but the differences are important.