Darren Lockyer. One of the best rugby league players ever.What's that guys name? Genuinely don't know it. No Loig in WA.
Darren Lockyer. One of the best rugby league players ever.What's that guys name? Genuinely don't know it. No Loig in WA.
I think a couple of her points were quite salient though.
It's somewhat irrelevant that the accusations relate to a time before he was contracted to rugby. He's with the Reds and the ARU now and that is what is being reflected.
I completely get the innocent until proven guilty concept and agree but it isn't nearly that simple. Damage to team and sport images as well as the sponsor brands doesn't wait on hold until there is an outcome. The damage starts immediately and at some point people may want to distance themselves from that.
I think the approach so far is the smart one. Stand him down until more information emerges after his first court appearance.
It really is a bit of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation for all involved.
It really is a bit of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation for all involved.
We unfortunately live in the age of trial be media. Still as a society we must rise above that, if possible.
I'm probably taking aim, unfairly, at Georgina more as the 'embodiment' of the sports media more than anything. to be fair to me though it is very easy to make sweeping generalizations after a few white wines.
<snip>
I remember when she first came on and was the refreshing breath of air that wasn't Grumbles. Her analysis was very light but at least she reported on the game and not bulltshit rumors from unnamed sources.
<snip>
Did you then set fire to your Foxtel box and move houseAll I can say is I turned it off and deleted my recording as soon as I saw that she was on the show.
I realise that standard NRL and ARU contracts have contractual clauses which deal with the idea of "bringing the game into disrepute", but that doesn't get around the fact that Hunt is guilty of nothing at this stage. If anything his only criticism in that regard can be that he associated with some people that were "potentially" involved in criminal activity.if that's the threshold for bringing the game into disrepute well then fuck, you might as well sack most of the professional footballs in this country.
Some journos just seem to have no concept of the presumption of innocence. this is something I'm passionate about.
Although I did read an article this week that a medical study has found that around 1,000 heart attacks each year in Australia are caused by extreme anger and rage so perhaps it's for the best that some of you have stopped watching Rugby HQ.
Cocaine can cause heart attacks (MIs).
I'm more worried about the people who hold such a grudge against Georgina Robinson that they refuse to watch a rugby show that she appears on.
most people who go to court are guilty of an offence. The ones who get off are usually on technicalities and not because they did nothing. Police have far better things to do than send people to court who did nothing.Innocent until proven guilty is all well and good but I think the chances of their innocence in this case is quite small.
It's an CCC investigation, not some small criminal act where police decide to charge them with little evidence (eg. an assault charge made from allegations only). The CCC are not going to press charges unless they have at least some substantial evidence.
In this case, even if they are proven innocent, they still put themselves in a poor environment and made a poor choice of mates by being in contact with some-one connected with a drug syndicate. This is disappointing enough from so called professional athletes and respected role models.
Personally, given these guys are being charged by the CCC is evidence enough they haven't been great role models. Maybe they aren't drug dealers but they certainly aren't acting like professional athletes either.
I choose not to watch plenty of programs because of who is on them or who is hosting.I'm more worried about the people who hold such a grudge against Georgina Robinson that they refuse to watch a rugby show that she appears on.
most people who go to court are guilty of an offence. The ones who get off are usually on technicalities and not because they did nothing. Police have far better things to do than send people to court who did nothing.