So until he fronts judiciary, his name will continue on the suspended list. Brilliant.
In terms of standardised guidance for Illegal and/or Foul Play and Misconduct, IRB Regulation 17 applies, and is used by nearly all judiciaries to assist to determine sanctions for citings.
(extract)
Judiciary Entry Point Based on Scale of Seriousness of the Player’s conduct, which constitutes the offending.
Law No.6.A.5, 10.4(k) Verbal Abuse of Match Officials,
Lower End 6 weeks, Mid Range 12 weeks, Top End 18+weeks, Maximum Sanction 52 weeks
Law No.6.A.5, 10.4(k) Physical Abuse of Match Officials
Lower End 24 weeks, Mid Range 48 weeks, Top End 96+ weeks, Maximum Sanction Life
Law No.6.A.5, 10.4(k) Threatening Actions or Words at Match Officials
Lower End 12 weeks, Mid Range 24 weeks, Top End 48+ weeks, Maximum Sanction 260 weeks
Depending on what kind of abuse he has been charged with, being suspended for about 70 weeks (and increasing with each week as time goes on), would cover most situations of guilt.
Why didn't the judiciary simply try him in absentia, and assign a maximum sentence and clear him off the "outstanding judiciary" list.
It is fairly obvious that the person has no intention of fronting judiciary. What kind of officious and petty bureaucrat is running the show in Brumbies judiciary? Former public servant perhaps?