• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Jeremy Paul Q & A on foxsports

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Spook

Guest
cyclopath said:
JP offers nothing on the Rugby Club. Is incapable of avoiding references to the "Golden years" at the Brumbies and making jibes about the other teams. They already have Kearns for that uninformative parochialism. Marto puts some thought in to it, Kafer is not bad (RUPA hat aside). Paul should be ditched - he doesn't seem capable of any insightful analysis.

JP is thick but Marto is the most provincial of any of them, always talks about the Reds, and makes the most derogatory comments on indidivual players ("he's rubbish" or the "team is rubbish" are his catch phrases) - I cringe at what he says. Kafer is the best analyst by a mile. Which state do you support again? :)
 

Biffo

Ken Catchpole (46)
Spook said:
cyclopath said:
JP offers nothing on the Rugby Club. Is incapable of avoiding references to the "Golden years" at the Brumbies and making jibes about the other teams. They already have Kearns for that uninformative parochialism. Marto puts some thought in to it, Kafer is not bad (RUPA hat aside). Paul should be ditched - he doesn't seem capable of any insightful analysis.

JP is thick but Marto is the most provincial of any of them, always talks about the Reds, and makes the most derogatory comments on indidivual players ("he's rubbish" or the "team is rubbish" are his catch phrases) - I cringe at what he says. Kafer is the best analyst by a mile. Which state do you support again? :)

Ahhh Kafer, Giteau, Spooky ... all members of the Happy Brumby Family :)
 
S

Spook

Guest
Biffo said:
Spook said:
cyclopath said:
JP offers nothing on the Rugby Club. Is incapable of avoiding references to the "Golden years" at the Brumbies and making jibes about the other teams. They already have Kearns for that uninformative parochialism. Marto puts some thought in to it, Kafer is not bad (RUPA hat aside). Paul should be ditched - he doesn't seem capable of any insightful analysis.

JP is thick but Marto is the most provincial of any of them, always talks about the Reds, and makes the most derogatory comments on indidivual players ("he's rubbish" or the "team is rubbish" are his catch phrases) - I cringe at what he says. Kafer is the best analyst by a mile. Which state do you support again? :)

Ahhh Kafer, Giteau, Spooky ... all members of the Happy Brumby Family :)

I've texted u a repost. ;)
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Spook said:
cyclopath said:
JP offers nothing on the Rugby Club. Is incapable of avoiding references to the "Golden years" at the Brumbies and making jibes about the other teams. They already have Kearns for that uninformative parochialism. Marto puts some thought in to it, Kafer is not bad (RUPA hat aside). Paul should be ditched - he doesn't seem capable of any insightful analysis.

JP is thick but Marto is the most provincial of any of them, always talks about the Reds, and makes the most derogatory comments on indidivual players ("he's rubbish" or the "team is rubbish" are his catch phrases) - I cringe at what he says. Kafer is the best analyst by a mile. Which state do you support again? :)
And Marto will happily call the Reds rubbish when they have been - witness the past few years. JP will accept NO criticism of any Brumby, and offers nil. Marto is not the most parochial, however, Kearns is.
 

Blue

Andrew Slack (58)
I can tolerate MArt these days. In a weird poke yourself in the eye sort of way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top