^^ Edited.
I've read that St Pat's were humiliated in the 1sts. Please. St Augustine's are a great team, lets not forget that they put 60 odd on Oakhill and within their opens squad boast 17 ISA players, whether or not they are considered to be deserved is another matter. The St Pat's backline were up against it from the get go and that's where Augustine's capitalised, scoring all 6 of their tries. In all honesty this is what most people would have suspected.
If you consider that humiliating, what do you have to say about the St Augustine's forward pack. I know Tukipili and Cook weren't playing and that will be your excuse, but every team, including St Pats have injuries. If there were no injuries St Pats would have a vastly different and better backline, not that any of you would care about that. From what I can understand, there were at least 5 ISA players in the forward pack as well as an u16 NSW Schoolboy. On paper you'd back Auggies. How wrong could you be. St Pat's won 7 tighthead scrums. Yes correct and if you have an all representative front row I'd hope you'd at least be able to win your own scrums. Pj Agliozzo, Matt Edwards, Tim Skinner and Matt Taylor have been part of St Pat's rolling 4 man front row, who throughout the year have set the platform as the best front row in the ISA hands down. What they did to the Auggies scrum was humiliating. The St Pat's forwards really took the game to Auggies and I feel probably outplayed them up front, but the speed of Auggies backrow balanced St Pat's physicality. All this nonsense about teaching St Pat's how to play etc etc, well the Auggies forwards could have learnt a lesson today in passion, technique and tightplay. Really both packs ought to be commended, as far as I saw, aside from one St Pat's player, the forwards didn't play an integral role in the scuffles, which is a commendation to both packs because in my opinion, the most intruiging rugby element of the game was the battle of the packs.