Same old drawbacks. Nothing has changed. No spring so poor jumper, lazy around the ground, can be good at rucks but lazy play means he just flops quite often.
Is great in the scrum. Got a good offload.
But hey, he kept Douglas out of the side last year even though he was leaving.
Still lean to troll. Especially on your comments on the France game.
you are probably too inexperienced to understand the difference between career ratings, long-term form and recent form ... and hence my views on the France v Wallabies game, if it is to that that you refer.
my point about the France game is that the form book may need rewriting after the November games. for example, England's recent form is very poor, but not such as to affect its career rating. South Africa's recent form is excellent but not good and long enough to affect its career rating. Australia's career rating has been consistently on the down for quite a while now; however, its recent form (which is poor) may take a dramatic upturn if it beats Ireland and/or England and the Frogs knock over a big team soon.
why do the bookies rate the Wallabies' performance last week so highly that they give them an almost 50/50 chance of rolling the champions of Europe away from home? the bookies' analysts' are trolling the good folk of GAGR? if so, jump in, take the massive overs available on Ireland and collect!
may i assure you that the rugby world, of which Australia is a very small part, saw the Wallabies' performance last Sunday as of very high-quality?
you really should have just confessed that you haven't seen anything of Timani's play in Europe. that would have left you some credibility.