Yeah, there was some better ball carrying, but the scrum and lineout were a shambles
Over time he will become very good.
When did we start giving away wallabies jerseys based on future potential?
There are deficiencies in his game that may be fixed with good coaching and improved fitness - which will likely take a season or more. Thats what super rugby is for. Its not going to happen on a 6 week tour.
Putting aside Skelton's scrum issues (which should be a deal breaker in their own atm) he hasn't been living up to this potential around the field and aside from his debut hasn't really offered more than any other lock in this regard.It's not based on future potential though. It's based on what he can do in general play.
We've been lacking impact in our forwards, particularly late in games all year. With TPN, Moore, Higgers, Fardy and Palu out, we are struggling for runners to get us across the advantage line. Add to that we lose out around the field when Slipper and Kepu come off.
Lock is clearly our weakest position in the pack and Simmons who is the 80 minute lock does plenty for our set piece but isn't generally a strong ball runner.
You make it sound like Simmons, Carter and Horwill have been doing the job well all season and there are no issues at lock.
It's not based on future potential though. It's based on what he can do in general play.
We've been lacking impact in our forwards, particularly late in games all year. With TPN, Moore, Higgers, Fardy and Palu out, we are struggling for runners to get us across the advantage line. Add to that we lose out around the field when Slipper and Kepu come off.
Lock is clearly our weakest position in the pack and Simmons who is the 80 minute lock does plenty for our set piece but isn't generally a strong ball runner.
You make it sound like Simmons, Carter and Horwill have been doing the job well all season and there are no issues at lock.
Putting aside Skelton's scrum issues (which should be a deal breaker in their own atm) he hasn't been living up to this potential around the field and aside from his debut hasn't really offered more than any other lock in this regard.
When his point of difference isn't that different, what's the point in picking him?
Simmons Carter and Horwill certainly haven't gone great (IMO also) but when comparing their performances to Skelton's overall performance the other three have been absolutely fabulously fantasticly awesomely great
You make it sound like Simmons, Carter and Horwill have been doing the job well all season and there are no issues at lock.
All Skelton has done in the Green and Gold was have a very good match against France (game 2 I think) mid year.
The rest of his performances are forgetable
Please point me to the memorable performances by our other locks.
I am not saying that Skelton has been good but you're making it sound like it's a travesty that Carter and Horwill haven't been picked for every single game.
Please don;t think that I reckon the other 3 are pplaying well all the time.
When compsared to the other 3 , Skelton, overall, is poorER
I'm in full agreement that Skelton was poor last week but how was he worse than Horwill??? He dropped a crucial pill early in the game 5m out and then missed two critical tackles. All within the first 20 minutes.
I don't think Carter has been that bad. The challenge is that the type of lock work he does is not the showy stuff, it is the dog work that goes underappreciated.
And skeletons work rate in defence and ball handling is better??
No doubt options are lacking but if I was an opposition coach I would have a very clear game plan to exploit the scrum deficiencies that occur late in the game when skelton comes on and it would involve scrum penalties followed by 3 pts or an attacking lineout.
I'm in full agreement that Skelton was poor last week but how was he worse than Horwill??? He dropped a crucial pill early in the game 5m out and then missed two critical tackles. All within the first 20 minutes.