Right. so - let me get this straight. It MATTERS whether it is done at a Rugby LEAGUE or a Rugby UNION Match??? Don't make me larffff..
In any case - to explain plain english - the comment about it showing what "nonsense" (thanks for quoting) it is - referred to the naked bloke with the conch shell, and the inexplicable people running about on a Rugby (League) pitch with Spears!!! What a complete and utter nonsense! Next thing, you will be telling me that its OK for the Maoris to do the Haka, but not ok for the Aboriginals to get a bunch of 'showmen' on the pitch (which they curiously stand behind I notice) to run about with Spears..!
Sounds alot like that Sense of Entitlement that someone was discussing earlier.
And before you accuse me of being "Silly" agan - I recall the Springboks pulling some similar stunt just a few years ago. was it against Samoa? Tonga? Fiji? - no, they hardly ever play them, Yes! - it was against the All Blacks.
To Quote an Expert, and a Poet: "They can do whatever they like at home but it's a load of shit that Unions let them do it at away games. The ARU should be looking to get every advantage it can, make them do it in the sheds or just ignore them and practice goal kicking ffs"
'ffs' - is olde English for 'For Fuck's Sake'. I think its Celtic.
The IRB imposed the current protocols, not the All Blacks or NZRU. Campo used to quite pointedly ignore the haka and quite frankly, no one cared.
If the IRB or the host unions banned the haka as you're suggesting, it wouldn't make a jot of difference to the All Blacks anyway. Sure there would be some whinging in the public arena here, we have our fair share of loud mouth militants just like everyone else.
But the All Blacks themselves would simply do as they did in Wales several years ago. Fat lot of good that did the Welsh at the time.
You say the ARU should be looking to get every advantage it can get, as if allowing the haka to be performed is some kind of disadvantage? If that's really the case, if the Wallabies are truly put on the back foot by facing the haka, well they shouldn't be out there in the first place.
I always find it interesting that the people who complain about the haka loudest are usually the ones regularly on the wrong end of the scoreboard. The English are the usual culprits, but I remember Gavin Hastings constantly whinging about it in his day.
Hastings had the same view as you apparently do, that the haka gave the All Blacks some kind of advantage. It's no wonder he was regularly spanked with that kind of defeatist attitude.
But the team who complains least, if at all? The Boks.
One of the reasons we respect them so much. They don't bother trying to make excuses, they just get on with trying to belt us. And their record speaks for itself.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk