The SANZAR judiciary seems inconsistent and arbitrary in both its citations and rulings.
Has the organization considered reforming its approach to citations, hearings and associated penalties? Would a points system for offenses, set periods for suspensions, and definitive rules for prior offenses help make the judiciary more reliable, consistent and transparent?
Good one - can you give me specific example with weeks etc.
Good one - can you give me specific example with weeks etc.
Good one - can you give me specific example with weeks etc.
The Digby Ioane vs Kade Poki debacle in about week 6 (Digby got 5 weeks, Poki not even cited when his tackle was arguably worse).
Good one - can you give me specific example with weeks etc.