Aurelius
Ted Thorn (20)
Had an interesting exchange with my sister-in-law this morning. She works in stadium management in Perth and from time comes into possession of tickets for sporting events. Anyway, she offered me and my dad a couple of freebies for next week's game, which we didn't take her up on, but it seems that they're trying to shift a lot of tickets for the opener. We figured it was because either people were just moving on from the Force, the new competition was a bit too gimicky, or a combination of the two.
Personally, while I enjoyed the spectacle last year and think some of the experimental changes are worthwhile, 35-minute halves are a step too far for me. 70 minutes just wouldn't feel like rugby, any more than that weird 100-ball format feels like cricket (even T20).
So it sounds like they're going to struggle to match the success of last year's comp (at least initially) and may have to go back to the drawing board with some of their rule variations. Apart from anything, whatever complaints people have made about the rules of rugby I've never heard anyone complain that it's too long.
Personally, while I enjoyed the spectacle last year and think some of the experimental changes are worthwhile, 35-minute halves are a step too far for me. 70 minutes just wouldn't feel like rugby, any more than that weird 100-ball format feels like cricket (even T20).
So it sounds like they're going to struggle to match the success of last year's comp (at least initially) and may have to go back to the drawing board with some of their rule variations. Apart from anything, whatever complaints people have made about the rules of rugby I've never heard anyone complain that it's too long.