I do not think he would be the danger man.
i agree to disagree.I do not think he would be the danger man.
He combines the best attributes of Pocock, Gill and Hooper into one player. All three of those players are better than any open-side flanker currently playing in the Northern Hemisphere on their own. The only thing Smith lacks would be the raw pace of Hooper. Other than that he is as strong a pilferer as both Gill and Pocock and as was evidenced in the Brumbies v. Reds match he still has that magical ability to avoid the official's whistle. He has an excellent linking game like Liam Gill and also has the footwork and explosiveness in traffic of Hooper allowing him to create space for other players on his own. He has play-making ability and even played 12 multiple times during his stint in France. He brings an extra element of dynamism to the forward play of his team overall through this aspect of his play. He's just as big as Pocock and has no issue going over top of players when he has to. I don't need to speak to his experience, if you don't already know of it you're on the wrong forum. If Smith starts for the Wallabies with a rookie like Tipuric, or even worse, a poor excuse for a 7 like Chris Robshaw playing for the Lions I think "hands off gold 7" will echo in the nightmares of Warren Gatland this August.
He will be the danger man because the Lions have no comparable fetcher and all round back row. If St Sam is the captain as the bookies predict, he will get a lesson in openside play from Smith. Although in fairness it doesn't matter which of the 7's Australia play, Hooper, Gill or Smith are a different class to anything the Lions can offer at 7.
Lol I am sorry but ever word help and that will leave you with about 385 words only.Ha - thanks for the contribution Rassie!
Key player I agree. But I remember 2001 how the Lions try to neutralize Smith and did it with good effect in that first test. They grabbed onto his shirt tugging him holding him off the ball at every moment. When BOD scored his try you could see him in the background throwing his hands in the air and the expression he had said it all. WTF guys do you call that defensei agree to disagree.
he may not be dangerous in terms of scoring tries, but he pilfers the ball back.
no ball no try.
genia said it, 'george is everywhere on the field'
In which case could I direct you to the thread about selecting a backrow with balance. If you have no world class "fetcher" 7 don't play a game that requires it. Change the backrow structures to play a counter RUCK game instead of a hands in game. Make it so that any time the pilferer tries to put their hands in its already a ruck, and make it obvious that this is the case, and secondly drive past the ball at the RUCK.
Sounds simply I know but, if you can't pick a pilfer at 7 don't play as if you have one.
On the Smith Question, 400 words is a big ask.
Backrow balance, experience not only in his play but for the whole squad, versatility to play the whole backrow,, all round skills, consistency in execution.
If you watch the Reds vs Blues game, the Blues did this really well and severely limited Liam Gill's impact on the match. He was always at the ruck trying to pilfer as he normally does but the clean out was so fast and efficient he had very little opportunity.
One of my favorite quotes. Don't know who said it but it goes like this.It might be too late for your submission Gagger, but one Smith's key traits is his ability to make telling contributions at key moments in games. When the game is there to be won or lost, great players step up to make a difference. Smith is one of those. Contrast with some of the more celebrated (recently anyway) players who look great but go missing when the key moments arise (or make mistakes in those plays). Genia is also good at this.
Hooper and Gill haven't yet shown, to my satisfaction, that they have this ability. That, and Smith's strength across all facets of a backrower's role, are the reasons he should be the starting 7 and why, in my view, he will be a danger to the Lions.
Being a "danger" doesn't require him to be an attacking weapon. Simply slowing down Lions ball, making key tackles and turnovers would be enough.