GAGR Wallaby POTY v New Zealand (1st test)

[RugbyReg]

Still processing myself. Go for it.

 

[KOB1987]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. Foley

HMs the rest of the backline ex Wright

 

[qwerty51]

3. Foley
2. Samu
1. Valetini

 

[Slim 293]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. AAA

 

[The Pirate]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. Foley

 

[Wilson]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. Kellaway

HM: Foketi

 

[Braveheart81]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. Foley

 

[Viking]

3. Valetini
2. Samu
1. AAA

Would have put Kellaway or Foley but the bombed try and time wasting.

 

[Froggy]

3. Valetini
2. Samu
1. Foley

 

[dru]

3. Valetini
2. Kellaway
1. Samu

HM Foley

 

[RugbyReg]

1. Valetini
2. Samu
3. Foley

just checking Foley is the best?

 

[Brumby Runner]

3. Valetini
2. Samu
1. Ala'alatoa

 

[Tomikin]

3 Valetini
2 Samu
1 7As (Allan Ala'alatoa)

 

[Joe Blow]

3. Valetini
2. Samu
1. Kellaway

 

[Tomthumb]

3. Valetini
2. Samu
1. Foley

 

[Thalium]

3. Samu
2. Foketi
1. Wright

 

[Derpus]

3. Samu
2. Valetini
1. Foley

 

[RugbyReg]

3 Samu
2 Valetini
1 Foketi.

 

[Froggy]

As to your question of me Reg, imo Foley had a fairly forgetable 1st half, but in the 2nd half I thought he took control of the game (something we've been wanting a 10 to do) and was one of the principal reasons we got back into the game. Just my opinion, all the Foley haters will certainly disagree, but that's what this is about, isn't it.

 

[drewprint]

As to your question of me Reg, imo Foley had a fairly forgetable 1st half, but in the 2nd half I thought he took control of the game (something we've been wanting a 10 to do) and was one of the principal reasons we got back into the game. Just my opinion, all the Foley haters will certainly disagree, but that's what this is about, isn't it.

I think Reg is just confirming that you have Foley at 3 point etc, as the order of your numbers differs to other posters.