• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Force vs Lions Super Rugby 2012 Rnd 14

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bardon

Peter Fenwicke (45)
Force need to turn their possession and territory into points before half time. This one doesn't look like being a high scoring affair and one break away try for the Lions and it might be too much for the Force to peg them back.

Now that I've said that watch both of them end up with try bonus points!
 

Bardon

Peter Fenwicke (45)
Btw has anyone had a good view of the biting incident? Website feed is a little hazy so couldn't see it clearly enough myself but from what was said in commentary CJ van der Linde could be in trouble.
 

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member
There was a forearm pressed into his face. Whether he bit or the arm was forced into his mouth isn't clear.
 

RedsHappy

Tony Shaw (54)
LMFAO - Brendon Canon on Ma'afu "He's a chance for the Australian squad tomorrow as we don't have many large men at 3 in Australia and Salesi Ma'afu has certainly grown in stature in the last two years." :)

Gnostic did you not recall that after Wallabies v Ireland @ Suncorp Deans anointed Ma'afu as 'coming of age as top class Test prop'.
 

kiap

Steve Williams (59)
Good effort from the Force, they worked hard tonight and can finally chalk up a win!
 
M

Moono75

Guest
Good to get the win. Boys showed a lot of determination to guts it out. Hope we finish out the year strong, get the franchise headed in the right direction and come on strong in 2013.
 

PaarlBok

Rod McCall (65)
CJ cleared
Rugby365
Bok prop cleared; Force lock fingered

Wed, 30 May 2012 11:13


The Lions' World Cup-winning Springbok prop CJ van der Linde has been cleared on a charge of biting.
A SANZAR judicial hearing on Wednesday found Van der Linde 'not guilty' of contravening Law 10.4 (m): Acts contrary to good sportsmanship.
This followed after he was cited for an incident in the 10th minute of the Lions' 11-17 loss to the Western Force at the weekend.
The citing was not upheld.
The SANZAR judicial hearing was held before judicial officer Paul Tully via video conference on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Stephan Weyers appeared as counsel on behalf of CJ van der Linde.
It was alleged that Van der Linde had contravened Law 10.4 (m), when he allegedly bit Force player Toby Lynn at the back of a ruck - while the Force player had the Lions prop in a head-lock.
In his finding Tully ruled the incident was more the fault of Force the lock, Lynn, than that of Van der Linde.
"For the citing to be upheld on such a serious breach of the laws of the game, it is necessary that there be a deliberate decision on the part of the cited player to bite," Tully said.
"The cited player whilst leaning over a player on the ground was held around the mouth in the forearm of a Force player [Lynn]. He was pulled back.
"It was during this motion that the Force player’s forearm came into contact with the cited player’s mouth.
"The cited player denied biting.
"He conceded that there were red marks on the forearm of the Force player consistent with what might have been made by teeth.
"The finding of the judicial officer is such that he accepted the cited player’s evidence that there was no deliberate intention to bite and that the marks were more consistent with a forearm being used in a levering type motion.
"The matter was minor. The mark had resolved within twenty minutes of the incident."
 

ChargerWA

Mark Loane (55)
I called that in the Shoutbox during the game. Lynn did have him in a headlock, was always going to be difficult to prove.
 

Mank

Ted Thorn (20)
Wtf? You see guys in that position all the time. However usually the person wing held doesn't bite. Why an absolute fucking joke.

Have you got a clip of the incident so we can judge for ourselves? Sounds as though your mind is made up so I'd like to see what you're basing it on. Curiously, it sounds as though you have no care for the headlock. In my opinion, rugby should be eliminating any reasons, or underlying causes that may lead to foul play, as well as penalising the foul play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top