To highlight that they may have chosen to ignore it passes no judgment on the motivation.He kind did…
That assumption is being made by others.
It was clearly an error of judgment by the game officials.
Cron has just pointed out that that's his opinion as one of his players was seriously impacted by the transgression by Swinton and the WF could have gained the benefit of a red card early in the match.
The refereees are "choosing to ignore" off-side, forward passes and other calls by the AR's all of the time - many of which allow teams to maintain momemtum and/or score points. You only have to have Sports Ears to know that.
In reality the ref is allowing them to have an unfair advantage despite the known transgression.
Such decissions by refs can/may change the outcome of games which is a poor and perhaps unwarranted consequence.
Some may suggest that such practices are open to bias or even corruption.