They're fucking mad!!!I’m interested to get an Aussie perspective on this:
There are a growing and vocal number of people in NZ calling for Cruden to be selected ahead of Carter, and McCaw to step aside for Sam Cane.
Is it just my bias, or are they all fucking mad?
They're fucking mad!!!
Right now Cruden is ahead of Carter, he has been all year. It was insane to not let Carter get his 100th though, so with Carter injured in the game last night it's a good time to make the change.I’m interested to get an Aussie perspective on this:
There are a growing and vocal number of people in NZ calling for Cruden to be selected ahead of Carter, and McCaw to step aside for Sam Cane.
Is it just my bias, or are they all fucking mad?
Interesting to hear these views but when you look at the stats Carter deserves his spot still.
He is stronger on defence, his goal kicking is better, his kicking meters are greater, and the backline functions with more fluidity when he's there. How could you start Cruden?
It seems that most of the more respected rugby brains here concur anyway.
Don't forget Barrett either! I think long term he offers more than Cruden.
He is stronger on defence
That's the one I disagree with - Even if the stats say Carter makes more tackles, Cruden makes big tackles and makes them often. When he is at 10 the opposition generally doesn't function as well.
Carter is past it, and Cruden injury prone.
NZ need to look overseas to their World Cup Medal winner Five Eighth in Donald. Getting him back in the 23 is the only way that they will build the necessary momentum needed for RWC 2015.
To prove this point, the Duck needs to be the starting 10 in the 2014 Bledisloe games.
I like Beaver (can you believe his nickname isn't duck?). But despite his World Cup heroics most kiwis are suss on him. Doubt he will ever be first choice starting 10 for the AB's with Barrett, Taylor and Sopoaga comeing along nicely.
But having posted the above it now comes to me you may be fishing.
<snip>
Meanwhile Fiji get their 5th yellow card.