• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Elsom - still playing wounded

Status
Not open for further replies.

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Elsom last played for the Barbarians against England at Twickenham on May 31, a week after a man of the match performance for Irish side Leinster in the Heineken Cup final, but has been sidelined by bone bruising in his knee since.

“It's uncomfortable but, on the scale of things, it's not too bad,” Elsom said of the injury.

Great player, but is this smart?
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
fatprop said:
Great good player, but is this smart?

agreed. It smacks of desperation I am afraid. I really don't see this paying off in this test. I suspect he will be found out.
 

naza

Alan Cameron (40)
Bone bruising ? Sounds like a bullshit injury. Buck played with a ripped scrotum. In my day...

I suspect he'll struggle with the pace, having zero match fitness. Horwill and Palu have struggled to lift to Tri-Nations intensity in their return from injury - it ain't easy.
 

naza

Alan Cameron (40)
Scotty said:
News Flash.

Naza in shock non support of Palu statement.

He got demoted because he makes so many yards he out runs his support. They are not ready for his brilliance yet.
 

Cutter

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
Yes but he mixed it up with Bismarck and that is worth 5 tackles and 5 runs.

Noddy I agree with your correction. Elsom is only a good player, not a great player. He may make a difference but I doubt he'll last the match.
 

naza

Alan Cameron (40)
fatprop said:
naza said:
Scotty said:
News Flash.

Naza in shock non support of Palu statement.

He got demoted because he makes so many yards he out runs his support. They are not ready for his brilliance yet.

The problem is that he hasn't been making yards

Vs ABs 6 runs for 36m
Vs Boks 3 run for 23m (and only 3 tackles )

http://www.rugbystats.com.au/rugby/?refresh=1250664660562

Oh, here we go..its all fun and games and then somebody comes along to ruin it with 'facts' and 'statistics'.

First, this stats site is full of shit, I don't believe any of it for a second (not since I saw Phil Waugh miss 4 tackles in 60 seconds and none of them get counted) and I'll have anybody on who thinks they can do a drive by with cherry picked bullshit stats.

How are Drew Mitchell and AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) the leaders of ruck/maul in Bledisloe 1 ? Oh, so we only count the first bloke who flops into the ruck ? There's no differentiation between Palu making hard yards off a retreating scrum and an outside back retrieving a kick and running up to the defence and getting belted. And Palu having his hands free to offload the ball but nobody being there in support ? Well, he doesn't get credit for that..nooooooooo.

So, thanks for that fatprop but correction - the problem is we haven't been getting him enough runs with the pill. Instead those epic gimps Barnes & Giteau have been murdering us with their shithouse kicking. Bring back Bernie !!
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Naza

I agree that pure stats can be misleading, but the do measure activity. Palu hasn't done enough in the last two games. He hasn't been getting into a position to call for the ball enough and get us going forward.

Many have questioned Sharpe's effort in the last game, but at least he got into position and had a run.
 

waratahjesus

Greg Davis (50)
fatprop said:
naza said:
Scotty said:
News Flash.

Naza in shock non support of Palu statement.

He got demoted because he makes so many yards he out runs his support. They are not ready for his brilliance yet.

The problem is that he hasn't been making yards

Vs ABs 6 runs for 36m
Vs Boks 3 run for 23m (and only 3 tackles )

http://www.rugbystats.com.au/rugby/?refresh=1250664660562

as compared to browns
v ABs 4 runs for 34m
v Boks 2 runs for 16m

yeah, brown will do much better, being smaller and and not as srong in the tackle will do the back of our scrum wonders on saturday!

out of our starting forwards, Palu made the second most metres in africa and most against NZ, i think the stats tell why he should be there!
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Yep, but Brown was the second highest tackler in the pigs.

To me, Brown's higher workrate and flexibility got him the nod.

Elsom is unlikely to last the match and Palu has struggled so far to do 80 minutes. So Brown got the nod as he is more of a chance to provide more effective minutes.

(Neither Brown or Palu has really set the world on fire this season)
 

Scotty

David Codey (61)
They have both been very average. No wonder Deans keeps wanting so many 7s in the squad - at least they are good at what they do.

I think Mowen or Higginbotham should have been in the original squad though. Even if it is for development purposes such as the Cooper and Beale arguements.
 

waratahjesus

Greg Davis (50)
fatprop said:
Yep, but Brown was the second highest tackler in the pigs.

To me, Brown's higher workrate and flexibility got him the nod.

Elsom is unlikely to last the match and Palu has struggled so far to do 80 minutes. So Brown got the nod as he is more of a chance to provide more effective minutes.

(Neither Brown or Palu has really set the world on fire this season)

brown hasnt lasted the 80 yet this season, i dont actually think he has a higher work rate at all.

vs new zealand
brown 6 tackles 3-missed tackles 3-rucks
palu 12 tackles 1-missed tackle 4-rucks

vs south africa
brown 8-tackles 1-missed 2-rucks
palu 3-tackles 1-missed 3-rucks

i think the brown fad of "workrate" is as big a myth as pococks ability. its all ego and talk, he hasnt delivered at international level and he wont provide ball for anyone on saturday, its a fact not a stat!

he has started seagulling, his runs are made wider and wider week by week, without palu we lack players who can go through the guts and get momentum, were going to end up going side to side all night. unless Elsom has come back from europe better than everyone.
 

disco

Chilla Wilson (44)
I think Mowen or Higginbotham should have been in the original squad though. Even if it is for development purposes such as the Cooper and Beale arguements.

Agreed, I still think Deans fucked up by going heavy on opensides & not having any real blindsides like Mowen & HB.

I think Mumm is a brilliant lock & Brown is a good 8 as is palu.
 

louie

Desmond Connor (43)
waratah do you won a calculator?
meters per run:

Palu
Abs = 6
SA = 7.66
Brown
ABs = 8.5
Boks = 8

also our scrum was strong even after Palu went off against.
your love for tahs is overbearing at times
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Brown at Mitchell were at my work today signing stuff. Mitchell looks bigger than him... maybe its the hair.
 

Gagger

Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Staff member
Was at Wallabies training yesterday morning. Rocky's knee looked fine. Not sure I could say the same for Hynes', but was informed he was OK by staff
 

waratahjesus

Greg Davis (50)
louie said:
waratah do you won a calculator?
meters per run:

Palu
Abs = 6
SA = 7.66
Brown
ABs = 8.5
Boks = 8

also our scrum was strong even after Palu went off against.
your love for tahs is overbearing at times

no calculator needed, palu made more runs to indicate a higher workrate, brown also saw a few balls out at centre in far more space than palu, palu has played a full 80, brown has not, its not tah love, im just saying on stats, brown is not this machine that his supporters keep going on about. in my opinion as a waratahs and wallaby fan brown is consistantly found wanting in heavy traffic at international level, when he is in close he has to fight to go to ground most of the time and it slows the ball down!

when palu went off, we were playing against a tired scrum. im not saying palu made our scrum, im just saying i like him better than brown. when he is getting smashed on saturday early, then you can make excuses for him!
 

Moses

Simon Poidevin (60)
Staff member
WJ makes a good point, it's easy to accumulate metres when you get the ball at 2nd receiver, taking the ball into contact from a ruck and making metres is an all together different proposition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top