My point, HJ, is that assumptions are made about the health of the game in its supposed heartland.
Those assumptions are unwarranted in the case of easts: the juniors profile after 12s/13s is non existent. Their former juniors go to the Wicks with their 35 scholarships, or uni or whatever.
I think they have turned a corner financially and with recruitment at all levels in the last year but they had a poor 2014 and their financials discussed in these threads were troubling.
Gordon have made huge strides in recruitment this year too.
There is a fight for survival going on at a number of clubs and it is not the role of the individual clubs to sacrifice their existences for the greater good: looking after the greater good is a job that belongs to the people at NSWRU and ARU.
Then you find that the behavior of the Easts club in this situation is O.K.
The greater good of the game of Rugby is one of the responsibilities of the governing bodies ,but it is not theirs alone.A fight for survival & respect for the game are not mutually exclusive,surely?
Each club also has a responsibility in this respect,because they & their players are the fundamental ingredient & heart of the game.Clubs should set the standards.
No one can complain that they strive to improve their standing by recruiting from outside their club,but in this instance they have taken over half the Penrith
team,a team which finished last in the competition,& a team that Easts defeated this season anyway.
The fact that Easts juniors are going to other clubs is no doubt a cause of frustration for the club,but they are not all going elsewhere because they are all getting
scholarships.I happen to know that a number of players go to Easts because they are offered significant inducements to do so,this includes colts.Perhaps the administrators there
should be examining their own spending habits when attempting to address troubling finances.It's a cop out to simply blame Randwick & Uni for poor results,those clubs have
had their difficulties in the past,& have managed to do something about it.No doubt losing players to them doesn't help however,but a lot of other clubs have the same experience.
Maybe Easts should also be looking at other reasons why players are leaving.
Most juniors want to play for their parent club,but there should be perceived opportunities for them at that level.Buying 8 players from another club, together with a number of players
recruited from other sources from outside the Easts club,is hardly the way to engender loyalty in Easts own, & I believe ,foster a sense of identity & desire to stay with Easts.
If I was an Easts player/junior ,I think I would be seriously considering my options under the present circumstances.
Whatever,I can only hope that Mr.Karma is keeping a close eye on the whole thing.