DPK
Peter Sullivan (51)
(Moving discussion from a thread were my posted had digressed off topic)
1. Alexander
2. Moore
3. Kepu
4. Vickerman
5. Sharpe
6. Horwill
7. Pocock
8. Higginbotham
(At scrum time, Sharpe would pack at 6.)
With the three Ents of Vickerman, Sharpe and Horwill all on the field at the same time, there can theoretically be one of each of them at every ruck the Wallabies contest.
Higginbotham can play a lot looser, acting as a ruck-bodyguard for the backline.
Pocock would have more opportunities as the greater ruck presence of the Wallabies pack would spread the opposition forwards thinner.
I was impressed with the way the front rowers played last night. They defended well and ran the ball very well in a few incidences in particular. However, the main problem was that they lacked support; either there wasn't any, or it was ineffective.
Problems/ other benefits? This is pretty theoretical stuff.
1. Alexander
2. Moore
3. Kepu
4. Vickerman
5. Sharpe
6. Horwill
7. Pocock
8. Higginbotham
(At scrum time, Sharpe would pack at 6.)
With the three Ents of Vickerman, Sharpe and Horwill all on the field at the same time, there can theoretically be one of each of them at every ruck the Wallabies contest.
Higginbotham can play a lot looser, acting as a ruck-bodyguard for the backline.
Pocock would have more opportunities as the greater ruck presence of the Wallabies pack would spread the opposition forwards thinner.
I was impressed with the way the front rowers played last night. They defended well and ran the ball very well in a few incidences in particular. However, the main problem was that they lacked support; either there wasn't any, or it was ineffective.
Problems/ other benefits? This is pretty theoretical stuff.