Cat_A
Arch Winning (36)
Although I agree with what you have said here Cat, and think that education of the players is a vital part cog of the gearbox that is involved, I also think that there IS presure brought to bear on the players, and medical staff, from the coaches & administrators and this can not be lightly discounted.
A player, at this point in time, is not likely to tell a coach to 'bugger off' if said coach controls his/her playing future. Education accross the whole code is important. It is through this education that the players are going to feel empowered enough to make the correct decisions.
Yes, but in many cases the pressure to play on regardless comes from not wanting to lose their starting spot or their place on the team; if they stay on the field, the coach doesn't have a reason to pick the other guy. That isn't pressure exerted by the coach, but it's pressure felt by the player.
I'm frustrated that we're making coaches and administrators out to be negligent, when they are also going off the responses of the players to the doctors, trainers etc.
I can agree with player education, but there NEEDS to be a concurrent culture change - and yes this will mean that commentators, spectators and shows such as Rugby HQ stop glorifying the player who gets up and plays on after the monster hit (Hooper on the weekend, anyone?).
It also means that ALL contact sports need to change the story of games - they aren't battles, there isn't a war of attrition, and the players aren't superhuman. They are normal people who play a game that we like to watch really well but who also get injured and break sometimes.