The Tahs' maul defence needs work
He wasn't wearing sky blue. Surprised Izzy didn't get cited for running into his foot
Or indeed fibula. Unless you meant Phibbs, as the Saffer commentators thought.It's just a dangerous at the tackle that Latu and Skelton did. Broken tibia and fibia if it connected flush on Folau's shin.
Yeah, maybe it should have probably been disallowed. But the referee and TMO had a clear view of it and allowed it, so I'm deferring to their judgement, since it favoured my team.What's the thoughts on AACs try? Was he held. I thought so. A tackle is completed when the tackled is holding the attacker and the attacker has one knee on the ground. He was clearly being held and the tackle was Completed
So variably reffed. I saw in one of the other matches a player tackled, still being held who got up and started running again. Ref just let play go on. I was sure AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)'s would be disallowed.Yeah, maybe it should have probably been disallowed. But the referee and TMO had a clear view of it and allowed it, so I'm deferring to their judgement, since it favoured my team.
Fair call. You no doubt get equally frustrated with Nick Phipps who does the same thing every week? Not to mention Phipps' repeated calling of "sir! ...sir! ...sir!" at every ruck/maul which actually drowns out the ref's voice at times in the ref mic.Watching the game now - Rayno Benjamin is a prick - Tahs scrum penalised and he runs in, getting in peoples' faces while he pats his front row on the back.
If I was one of the Cheetahs' props, I'd be telling him to fuck off back out where he belongs.
I've commented before if Phipps wasn't a Tah I would fucking hate him. He does get very annoying.