Yes. I have been banging on about this for years. We need a properly structured, tiered competition, not a grouping based on events that occurred 100 years ago because "tradition". Rugby in this country faces existential challenges and the private schools are its strongest nursery. It needs to fix this up, and if the schools can't do it, the decision will be made by someone else. It's utterly stupid GPS protecting its sacred traditions when two of its schools can't even field a 1st XV any more.
As a Rugby fan, as you know, I agree with you.
I just think that schools don't have the focus on this sport that they used to and I can't see any other body being able to interfere.
So maybe the only way for Rugby to rebuild is to produce much better Wallaby results thus enticing more juniors to join and stay in the sport.
Look at women's and men's soccer, aside from the mummy contact concerns.
If it's funds the ARU need, as well as proper management, then the only solution may be a generous benefactor, can't see many business sponsors jumping on them at the moment, like they used to 20+ years ago.
I know this goes against the grain of building from grass roots up, but as I said, the attraction to join Rugby at junior level, and stay in it v Rugby League, appears to be waning quickly.
You know the old saying : Everything starts at the top!
P.S. Many other countries don't appear to have the same issues with their Rugby performance, and I recon their are plenty of mums, and competing sports, in those countries.