As it should be +1.
The $500,000 - is that p.a. or over the 3 years?
14A's went to Knox.
16A's to Barker.
4ths, 3rds, 2nds and 1st xv's all to Knox
Well said. I guess, all I'm saying is that the other coaches don't get mentioned. Those 3 coaches were spoken about a lot at different times.
I don't think there is necessarily much heat on coaches given that the majority are employed as teachers not rugby coaches. Williams at Knox is an exception - if you are employed solely to deliver a schoolboy premiership and you fail to do so then that criticism is valid. One out of three is good but if you were in private enterprise the shareholders could rightly ask what happened during the other two years. Cornish is a maths teacher and sometime year master and helps out with athletics and the variety of other stuff teachers get asked to do such as parent teacher night next week etc etc. Maloney is a year master, teacher and 1st XI cricket coach so he divides his time between several pursuits. I'm sure Engele and the others do the same (by the way Engele left on a teaching promotion as he has every right to do, not a coaching contract). Knox hasn't shoved it back in everyone's faces - rather it has shown that it takes a professional rugby coach three years and about AUD 500,000 to deliver a premiership. The sad thing about it is that I am sure they had a talented bunch of players but the professional thing rankles a bit at schoolboy level. For all the other coaches come Monday it will be back to teaching, school reports and normal life at school. As it should be.
Knox parent reply - Knox seems to be caught between a rock and a hard place - if they don't win with all the effort that was expended they or the coach are underperforming but if they do win they have bought a premiership. I don't know how many of the lads in the first XV have had any 'assistance' to be at the school. Knox played consistently well all season and deserve their success. If too much effort and dollars are being spent on rugby it will be up to the parents to send this message to the Headmaster and school board.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
/cut/
If Knox's size and funding establishes some long-term domination that makes them difficult to knock off, what would be the sense of playing against them ?An overly cautionary lament perhaps, but Knox will need to be careful that they don't become the 'monster that ate the CAS'.
Do you mean on the day or the season? I may well be mistaken but thought Knox 16As had only lost 1 over the 10 rounds.14A's went to Knox.
16A's to Barker.
4ths, 3rds, 2nds and 1st xv's all to Knox
Do you mean on the day or the season? I may well be mistaken but thought Knox 16As had only lost 1 over the 10 rounds.
Do you mean on the day or the season? I may well be mistaken but thought Knox 16As had only lost 1 over the 10 rounds.
Knox also won the 15'as but in my opinion Waverley were the better team but were apparently robbed in the Aloys game
Hmmmm. Having witnessed some curious interpretations from the refs at Death Valley on occasion I'm not sure that Waves should be looking to play the 'we wuz robbed' card too often.
Everyone who loses blames the ref. Take a leap out of Michael Clarke's book and admit that sometimes your best just isn't good enough on the day.Knox also won the 15'as but in my opinion Waverley were the better team but were apparently robbed in the Aloys game
/cut/
If Knox's size and funding establishes some long-term domination that makes them difficult to knock off, what would be the sense of playing against them ?An overly cautionary lament perhaps, but Knox will need to be careful that they don't become the 'monster that ate the CAS'.
Fair point and certainly at Waverley any victory over the more economically-privileged schools (read everyone else) is sweet. I suppose my point concerns broader issues as to what type of board and what group of parents thinks that creating a behemoth and then winning a lot serves any purpose other than showing the more cash you put into something often leads to success.I agree with some of what you are saying, but I don't believe that Joeys' historical success in rugby or Shore's in rowing has disinclined other teams from competing against them. Rather, it sweetens any victory achieved.
And I agree it would be preferable if all schools stayed firmly planted in that purely amateur era. But I think the genie has escaped the bottle and is unlikely to return to be recorked. Perhaps it was inevitable that at least one of the CAS schools would jump on the GPS bandwagon and try and turn their top few teams into semi pro outfits. The annual 16s and Opens match ups between CAS and other associations almost ensured that as the gap grew, someone would seek to close it. But so long as Knox and any other CAS school works solely toNo, i dont think its just you BRUMBIEJACK
And I agree it would be preferable if all schools stayed firmly planted in that purely amateur era. But I think the genie has escaped the bottle and is unlikely to return to be recorked. Perhaps it was inevitable that at least one of the CAS schools would jump on the GPS bandwagon and try and turn their top few teams into semi pro outfits. The annual 16s and Opens match ups between CAS and other associations almost ensured that as the gap grew, someone would seek to close it. But so long as Knox and any other CAS school works solely to
improve the home grown product rather than seeking to dial a team in later years, I can live with them paying coaches and otherwise resourcing the program. If the parents who pay the fees don't like it, they will make that known.
I completely understand the dilemma Knox is in, but it is a dilemma of their own making. As soon as you professionalise in an amateur (schoolboy) competition, you can't win. Spend big bucks to professionalise & you have to win. And when you do win people throw rocks at you for spending money. Parents and the board can pat themselves on the back for such sporting success but it needs to be put into context (i.e. what funding resources do their opponents put into the same programs). This is unfortunate for the boys as an undefeated season is testimony to the fact that they must have been good players.
I'm not sure that Knox's board or the parents care, but when each year intake is 50% bigger than most other schools in the competition and big bucks are spent on professionalising the rugby 'program', I'm not sure what sense of achievement comes from being the biggest and richest kid on the block and then winning.
As a Waverley parent our class sizes are 200 max and the fees nearly a third of Knox's. We (and I daresay other schools) couldn't try to match the personnel or funding resources even if we wanted to. And the ethos of the school would prevent us from doing so.
One good thing about the CAS comp has been that it has always been much less tainted by the funding war that GPS rugby started. Professional sports coaches, unlike teachers are likely to have less loyalty to the school because they have less contact with the broader school community. So in future years we may see rugby coaches sacked or moved on for not delivering what their pay packet demanded. It is a potential dilemma for the CAS in a broader context. Currently only Waverley and Knox have substantial numbers of teams in all age groups, so rugby as a winter sport of choice is in trouble as it is.
This is an important question however the horse has bolted whether the man from Snowy River can be sent out to catch it is the issue. Trinity has won the swimming for a number of years - I assume that they have coaches with expertise in swimming as would other schools
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk