casrugby12
Allen Oxlade (6)
so im hearing that vevers might not be at fullback who will it be for st aloys ?
so im hearing that vevers might not be at fullback who will it be for st aloys ?
so vevers at 13 or 12 ?The younger brother of the incumbent fly half .Dainton I think ???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have no way of knowing whether this is true or not. But for as long as anyone can remember, the Associated Schools competition has been affected by the disparity in the size of the schools. It goes some way to explaining why Cranbrook and St Aloysius, these days, will usually struggle to make an impact in the 1st XV competition.
I wouldn't assume, however, that it's a straight-line relationship. Even if Knox filled its years with 300 boys, many of them would be soccer players, or swimmers who played no other sport, or AFL, or volleyball, or any one of the other options now available.
Most schools begin full-on training this week. Any news?
so vevers at 13 or 12 ?
I
It's true that there are circa 300 boys in yr 7 and not far off that in year 8. However, tragically, there are only 6 or so rugby teams in each year. A number of the GPS schools would field that number of teams with half the year size. Not sure how this measures up with say Barker which is also a large school. Anyone know?
Appears that most schools have internal trials this Saturday. Cranbrook and Waverley play a trial on 29 March.
Pride
That's just a juvenile answer.
The actual reason, for anyone interested, is the change in the Associated Schools season. For the last six years or so, the competition has been ten rounds, home-and-away. That schedule - ten competition games - puts significant pressure on the coaches to keep their squads intact throughout the season - especially schools like Trinity, Cranbrook and St Aloysius, who have small playing squads. The cost of this has been that non-competition fixtures have suffered - even long-standing rivalries like Cranbrook/Scots, Trinity/Newington and Knox/Shore have become hard to fit into the calendar. Coaches simply don't want to risk losing players to injury - so a midweek Waratah Shield game isn't attractive to anyone.
Actually, this has always been an issue, now I think of it. I remember Trinity entering in 1980, when it thought it had a chance to do well. It won its first game, against Forest High, 31-0, but the only available day for the next round was in the week before a particularly important Associated Schools game. So Trinity sent its Seconds off to play North Sydney Boys, and lost narrowly. Trinity ended up as CAS premiers so no doubt thought it was the right decision.
I'm not suggesting that an Associated Schools team would win the Waratah Shield, although there have been sides over the years that would have given it a good shake. To my mind, the introduction of the home-and-away season has had several disadvantages, and the inability to compete in the Waratah Shield is one of them.
I can't say I'm a huge fan of the ten-round CAS competition. Certainly it achieves its purpose, which is to ensure that the best side wins. But it's gruelling and it skews things in favour of the larger schools. If a smaller school kept its squad intact and achieved an upset, it used to be in with a chance at the premiership. But in most seasons under the home-and-away system, the premiership has been all but decided after the first round of matches, and there have been some cricket scores in the return matches after injuries have depleted several squads.
The Waratah Shield should be a great competition - it's a pity that many schools feel it is impractical to enter.
True - are there any developments on an advisory level to address these concerns that you know of or do they just simply fall by the wayside ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You make a good point - what other sports are so dominant?
I only got one bite,but it was a big one!That's just a juvenile answer.
The actual reason, for anyone interested, is the change in the Associated Schools season. For the last six years or so, the competition has been ten rounds, home-and-away. That schedule - ten competition games - puts significant pressure on the coaches to keep their squads intact throughout the season - especially schools like Trinity, Cranbrook and St Aloysius, who have small playing squads. The cost of this has been that non-competition fixtures have suffered - even long-standing rivalries like Cranbrook/Scots, Trinity/Newington and Knox/Shore have become hard to fit into the calendar. Coaches simply don't want to risk losing players to injury - so a midweek Waratah Shield game isn't attractive to anyone.
Actually, this has always been an issue, now I think of it. I remember Trinity entering in 1980, when it thought it had a chance to do well. It won its first game, against Forest High, 31-0, but the only available day for the next round was in the week before a particularly important Associated Schools game. So Trinity sent its Seconds off to play North Sydney Boys, and lost narrowly. Trinity ended up as CAS premiers so no doubt thought it was the right decision.
I'm not suggesting that an Associated Schools team would win the Waratah Shield, although there have been sides over the years that would have given it a good shake. To my mind, the introduction of the home-and-away season has had several disadvantages, and the inability to compete in the Waratah Shield is one of them.