Man on the hill
Alex Ross (28)
Fred87 - I think you have picked it like a nose! Trinity also have a v strong pack & got ripped up. I think Waverley's success has been based on a strong midfield defensive - strong defence becomes an offensive tool!
It might also be the defensive prowess of the Waverley backline. Agree in the first encounter Waverley forwards dominated and Barker backs were starved. But in the second match i thought the forwards battle was more even. Barker backs saw a lot of ball, especially at the back end of the match where they often score heavily. The Waverley backs worked well as a team in terms of defensive formation and individually tackled well. Barker with loads of ball in the 2nd half did not threaten the Waverley line; then pushed a pass that was intercepted..
Interesting that Waverley restricted Barker to 1 try but conceded 4 to Aloys. Wondering if the loss of O'Donnell is critical to their defensive organisation? Or perhaps they relaxed against Aloys after the big effort against Barker? A few posts earlier in the season commented on teams struggling to perform the match after playing Barker. Be interested in the views of Waverley supporters who were at the Aloys match.
the other item that Waverley did well, there number nine put a lot of pressure on his opposite number, which in turn creates slow ball enabling the rest of the back line to insert pressure on Barker's back line
I didn't pick that up from my poor vantage point. Explains why Barker forwards held their own even though a man down and why Waverley always seemed to have enough troops in defence in the backs. Got the result so good tactical coaching.In the second game they dropped one of there forwards into the back line with Barker one man down they were able to do this which close the holes if any appeared,
special mention to the sub, No22 or 23?
Reading some of the above posts about people complaining how Waverly has their prep school players poached? That a bit petty don't you think? Can you really complain about loosing prep school kids, lots can change in ~10 years guys. I know that A LOT of the boys that played in the 'prep/junior school 1sts' at the CAS school I attended did not go on to player rugby past year 7. So can we really complain about the poaching of prep-school players?
They don't get poached.. they leave because while the waverley prep is highly regarded the high school has a poor reputation academicallyReading some of the above posts about people complaining how Waverly has their prep school players poached? That a bit petty don't you think? Can you really complain about loosing prep school kids, lots can change in ~10 years guys. I know that A LOT of the boys that played in the 'prep/junior school 1sts' at the CAS school I attended did not go on to player rugby past year 7. So can we really complain about the poaching of prep-school players?
Sadly wont get to see any of it, as wife's birthday, and that means under the thumb![]()