why does trinity starlett number 10, jamo clark attack in number 10, but defend in number 15. Is it because he is too scared or too soft?
I'm reluctant to respond to this, because sneering personal attacks on players shouldn't be in this forum.
Still, stripped of the personal abuse, the question is a legitimate one, so here's my view. I have watched Clark's defence closely this year in the few games I have seen. He is certainly not scared to defend, nor is he soft. he goes in willingly, and works hard in defence.
On the other hand, his technique is poor. He tends to tackle with his arms rather than with his shoulder, which means that often he has to hang on to the player he has tackled and wait for someone else to intervene with a more decisive hit.
My guess is that there are two reasons for taking him to full-back in defence. The first is to remove the predictable opposition tactic of targetting the playmaker by running big forwards at him all day. I'd do it, if I were coaching against Trinity. The second reason is that, with Clunies-Ross out injured, it gives allows Trinity to return kicks with a counter-attacking runner at the back. I have no inside knowledge on this - it just seems to me, as someone who has played and watched a lot of Rugby over the years, that those are the reasons.
By the way, ILM, see how it's possible to analyse what happens on a Rugby field without having to accuse someone of being "too soft" or "too scared"?