• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Carter, Rokocoko , Inhoff - Corticosteroid Use (Allegedly)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
Bugger. Was hoping for extended jailtime. Would've made invaluable additions to the AllTime Crim 1st XV

http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/community/threads/all-time-crim-1st-xv.15143/page-9#post-886233

Carter doing the rodeo in Joliet easily usurps Willie Ripia from starting line-up, him with his poxy "dressing room looting." Small time.

J.Rok's tossing salad in cell block H, thank Christ for some speed out wide, piss off "John Ryan", total passenger out there.

Imhoff completes a lethal (haha, "lethal") back 3, Eric Rush can try his luck at "Alltime 7's Crim 1st VII". It's 7's, as if anyone would give a shit
 

Ignoto

Peter Sullivan (51)

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Not directly commenting on this as the details are sketchy still, but my issue in sport currently to do with TUEs is the lack of real transparency. Corticosteroids have their place for treating many medical and injury-related conditions, but there is no doubt at all that they do confer a performance advantage in sports. A cortisone injection with local anaesthetic to get a player through a match is one thing, but certain corticosteroids have a degree of benefit from stripping fluid and weight in cycling, apart from the temporary general feeling of awesomeness one gets when taking a short course. If anyone thinks the system as it stands is not open to some degree of abuse, they are naive.

Again, I'm not directly commenting on these cases, more the general issue.



Mr Cyclo would you think that the application of such medications by a medical professional which has the ability to mask the pain caused by an injury could have the unintended consequence of exacerbating the injury, or placing the patient in danger of causing permanent/serious damage to themselves. Do you consider there to be an ethical issue in such prescriptions?

For example there are the historical cases of players being given significant doses of medication to allow them to play with broken bones. What risk that not feeling the (real) pain from one break allows them to push the boundaries of the physical and either inflict serious harm on themselves or others?
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Mr Cyclo would you think that the application of such medications by a medical professional which has the ability to mask the pain caused by an injury could have the unintended consequence of exacerbating the injury, or placing the patient in danger of causing permanent/serious damage to themselves. Do you consider there to be an ethical issue in such prescriptions?

For example there are the historical cases of players being given significant doses of medication to allow them to play with broken bones. What risk that not feeling the (real) pain from one break allows them to push the boundaries of the physical and either inflict serious harm on themselves or others?

Yes, they could have unintended consequences. But if they have fully informed consent, the risk is on the player's head. Theoretically. But it is murky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top