On the other hand you might notice that some of us think you argument has merit but are trying to be optimistic. I am hoping that with good support the Vikings concept will be driven to be neutral and unbiased as the implications of alienation of its client base and memberships, damage to reputations (included with the Brumbies, UC and other Canberra corporate entities who support rugby) is too higher risk. If the NRC team fails it may undo Vikings rugby, but there is a huge risk it may take down others.
Personally I ask that you do support the concept and by being a part of it you can help shape it and people like me on the outside can then see clearly if its being run transparently, (as best it can with politics and financial pressures) and also so I can hear a voice from other clubs advocating their players, which some of us have never head of. You see, until you got on here and said your piece I had no idea about the players you mentioned etc.
Now to be clear - my motivation is not to any club, but to see the game survive and grow for purely selfish reasons - so I can watch it and enjoy the game - I have little to no interest the BS off the field. What is confusing me and really turning me off this whole thing is for a tough game, my god there are so many winging about feelings, and being precious and he or she is being mean, turfing the toys out the cot, the dummy spitting and worrying if the colour of the shirt suit me, my complexion and handbag and if it clashes, compliments or makes you look fat; can I been seen to be associating with northside, southside or Queanbeyan people without my social group judging me...
FFS - you, me, Tomikin, and Slim etc should be there, beer in hand coaching and managing the team on the sideline at the opening home game! Or, do you leave "them" unsupervised and without your's or our voice to argue the point?