Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Cyclo - I think between then Fainifo and Leiilifano made more line breaks than the Sharks.
Quote from another thread:
Obviously I was watching the same game as the Kiwi journo. The difference is probably that he doesn't have a working knowledge of scrums, judging by his assertion that the Brumbies scrum produced tries "from resulting crashes at the line".
That is like saying that my team won based on the first kickoff of the night. Or that the Wallabies owed their wins in the Bill Young era to pure scrummaging power and not outright trickery.
It was around the time of Alexander's second try that the Brumbies were getting on top at scrum time, but their inability to finish off a couple of 5m pushes shows they weren't all that (though personally I think the Sharks should have been penalised for standing up).
Note also that putting Adi Jacobs at hooker would produce "an all Springbok front row" but that doesn't mean that they can scrum for shit.
Beware of journalists bearing gifts.
Quote from another thread:
Spook said::lmao: Which game did you watch mate?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=10631951
Obviously I was watching the same game as the Kiwi journo. The difference is probably that he doesn't have a working knowledge of scrums, judging by his assertion that the Brumbies scrum produced tries "from resulting crashes at the line".
That is like saying that my team won based on the first kickoff of the night. Or that the Wallabies owed their wins in the Bill Young era to pure scrummaging power and not outright trickery.
It was around the time of Alexander's second try that the Brumbies were getting on top at scrum time, but their inability to finish off a couple of 5m pushes shows they weren't all that (though personally I think the Sharks should have been penalised for standing up).
Note also that putting Adi Jacobs at hooker would produce "an all Springbok front row" but that doesn't mean that they can scrum for shit.
Beware of journalists bearing gifts.